Hacker News Front Page
중도 성향
IT/기술
Warren's Abstract Machine: A Tutorial Reconstruction
Comments
"WARREN" · 총 55건
필터 보기현재 지수
50.3
0 = 부정 우세
50 = 중립
100 = 긍정 우세
최근 7일 기준 85,292건을 분석한 결과, 뉴스 심리지수는 50.2(균형)입니다. 긍정 4,242건(5.0%)·중립 78,940건(92.6%)·부정 2,110건(2.5%)이며, 중립 비중이 뚜렷하게 높습니다. 성향 지수는 종합 14.8(중도 균형)입니다.
Comments
Two Senate Democrats on Thursday called on the Trump administration to stop the production of a 24-karat gold coin bearing President Trump’s image to commemorate America’s 250th birthday, with the lawmakers expressing concerns that some of the gold used by U.S. Mint could be traced to foreign cartels. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Ron Wyden...
The Chicago Bears are one step closer to leaving not only the city of Chicago, but also the state of Illinois, and heading over the border into Indiana. A statement from Chicago Bears Chairman George McCaskey and President and CEO Kevin Warren, posted to their X account on Friday reads: “Yesterday, the Chicago Bears Board […]
In de geboortestreek van d'Artagnan, de beroemde Franse musketier van wie mogelijk het skelet in Maastricht is ontdekt, wordt met verbazing en verontrusting gekeken naar de gang van zaken rondom het onderzoek. Bij de opgraving zouden ernstige fouten zijn gemaakt, waardoor een aanzienlijk deel van de botresten mogelijk niet meer kan worden geïdentificeerd. "Wat me kwaad zou maken, is als de beenderen zodanig zijn aangetast dat we niet meer kunnen vaststellen of het om d'Artagnan gaat of niet", zegt Aymeri de Montesquiou (83), bij wie DNA is afgenomen om dat met de resten te vergelijken. De Montesquiou zou via de bloedlijn van de moeder van d'Artagnan verwant zijn aan de musketier. De NOS zocht hem op in zijn kasteel in het plaatsje Marsan. Onderzoek had in Frankrijk gemoeten "Ik betreur de verwarring", zegt hij vanuit zijn bibliotheek, omringd door eeuwenoude boeken. "Ik ben er echt van overtuigd - en ik zeg dat niet uit nationalisme - dat het onderzoek in Frankrijk had moeten worden uitgevoerd. In een laboratorium van de politie of de gendarmerie. Dan zou alles waarschijnlijk rustiger zijn verlopen." De Montesquiou stond in Parijs bloed en speeksel af voor vergelijkend DNA-onderzoek. Dat gebeurde volgens hem in aanwezigheid van archeoloog Wim Dijkman, die verantwoordelijk was voor het eerste deel van de opgraving in Maastricht. "De monsters zijn vervolgens naar München verstuurd", zegt hij. "Maar daarna is er in Nederland een verwarrende situatie ontstaan. Ik heb de indruk dat meerdere personen de eer van de ontdekking willen opstrijken." Op de vraag of Frankrijk nu alsnog zou moeten ingrijpen, antwoordt De Montesquiou instemmend. "Omdat het over een heel belangrijk persoon gaat, zouden we de rust moeten terugbrengen", zegt hij. "Frankrijk zou moeten zeggen: geef ons de monsters, dan laten we ze analyseren in een goed laboratorium." De vondst van het skelet was in maart wereldnieuws. Vooraanstaande kenners van d'Artagnan hadden al langer het vermoeden dat de musketier onder de Sint-Petrus-en-Pauluskerk in de wijk Wolder lag begraven. Dat bij het lichaam ook een Franse munt en resten van een musketkogel zijn gevonden, leidde tot nog meer enthousiasme. Maar de aanvankelijke euforie maakt steeds meer plaats voor zorgen. De gemeente Maastricht stuurde vorige week een feitenrelaas naar de gemeenteraad waarin staat dat Dijkman geen vergunning had voor de opgraving. De gemeente nam daarom begin maart de regie over, in samenwerking met de Saxion Hogeschool in Deventer. Het archeologenteam van de gemeente stelt dat de beenderen tijdens de opgraving ernstig zijn aangetast, waardoor het "duidelijk is dat er sprake is van een aanzienlijk verlies aan informatiewaarde". Een onderzoeker die anoniem wil blijven, zei tegen de regionale omroep L1 dat meer dan de helft van het materiaal is "verstoord". Botresten zouden in plastic ijsbakjes los bij elkaar zijn gedaan, zonder goed bijgehouden documentatie. Ook is op beelden te zien hoe Dijkman in het graf stond en met blote handen resten aanraakte. Een deel van de botresten wordt bovendien nog door de voormalig stadsarcheoloog achtergehouden. Nadat hij had geweigerd deze aan de gemeente over te dragen, zat hij kortstondig vast voor het overtreden van de Erfgoedwet. Tasten in het duister "De situatie is voor ons erg onduidelijk", zegt ook Alina Goebel, werkzaam voor het d'Artagnan-museum in Lupiac, waar de musketier opgroeide. "Zeker omdat wij de ontwikkelingen vooral via de pers volgen. Alle verhalen rond de archeoloog, de kwesties met de parochie. We zitten ver bij Maastricht vandaan, dus we tasten ook een beetje in het duister." Hoewel nog verre van zeker is of het skelet inderdaad van d'Artagnan is, krijgt het museum in Lupiac door de vondst al meer bezoekers. "Iedereen is heel nieuwsgierig", zegt Goebel. "We krijgen vaak vragen of er al nieuws is over de resultaten." Aymeri de Montesquiou heeft geen contact met de gemeente Maastricht. De oud-senator had een lange loopbaan als politicus en wordt in Frankrijk ook als omstreden beschouwd vanwege belastingontduiking en innige banden met Rusland. "Ik zou graag willen dat de zaken worden opgehelderd en dat er geen interne ruzie is", zegt hij. "Het is heel goed mogelijk dat het skelet van d'Artagnan is. Maar we moeten afwachten en dit moet op een serieuze manier worden aangepakt." De gemeente Maastricht geeft op 17 juni een persconferentie over het onderzoek naar het skelet. Het is onduidelijk of dan al eerste resultaten worden bekendgemaakt. Bronnen zeggen tegen L1 dat het tot dit najaar kan duren voor een definitieve uitspraak kan worden gedaan.
Warren invited the Nvidia CEO to appear before the Senate Banking Committee on June 11 to answer questions about export controls and China business
From Judge David Leibowitz (S.D. Fla.) in Mosler v. Wagner; plaintiff Warren Mosler is a hedge fund executive, author on… The post A Rare Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Libel Case appeared first on Reason.com.
After a glioblastoma diagnosis, value investor Guy Spier rethought wealth, time and legacy — and the impact he can have on rare disease research.
AI-specific taxes on tokens and compute — and billionaire-backed worker displacement funds — would break the resilience of the tax code through history.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren is pressing Jensen Huang's Nvidia over export controls, China sales, Trump and data-center policy as Congress scrutinizes the AI chip boom.
Tom Barrett of Michigan, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Thomas Massie of Kentucky voted with 211 Democrats to approve the resolution.
The victim said Warren Togiatama’s actions left her carrying a 'heavy cloak' of pain.
Alphabet has secured a massive $45 billion equity offering, with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway leading with a $10 billion investment. This substantial capital infusion is earmarked for bolstering Google's AI compute infrastructure, a critical area identified by CEO Sundar Pichai. The company anticipates a total of $85 billion for this AI build-out, underscoring its strategic focus on artificial intelligence.
The Republican-led US House of Representatives approved a resolution on Wednesday to block President Donald Trump from continuing the war against Iran, reflecting growing concern among members of his party about the three-month-old conflict. The House voted 215 to 208, as four Republicans voted with Democrats in favor of the war powers resolution, which directs Trump to withdraw US troops from Iran unless Congress declares war or authorises the use of military force. The move marked the first time the Republican-controlled House had approved a measure seeking to force Trump to wind down military operations against Tehran since the war began three months ago. It was the latest setback for Trump in Congress despite his party’s slim majorities in both the House and Senate. For now, the vote is largely symbolic, as legislation must pass the Senate as well as the House to become effective, and there is debate over whether war powers resolutions would be constitutional even if they are approved by Congress. The vote, nonetheless, reflects unease among some Republicans over Trumps handling of the conflict and marks a rare bipartisan effort to curb presidential war powers as the war has entered a fourth month. Three previous war powers resolutions had failed in the House by increasingly slim margins and the chamber’s Republican leaders abruptly postponed a vote on this one last month when it looked likely to pass. The Senate advanced a separate, but similar resolution last month in a procedural vote, after seven previous attempts had failed. Further votes on the Senate measure have not yet been scheduled. The four House Republicans who voted for the war powers resolution were Representatives Tom Barrett of Michigan, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Thomas Massie of Kentucky. No Democrats voted against it. Seven House members did not vote. Recent pushback against Trump Trump recently has faced some opposition from members of his party in Congress, after months in which very few Republicans pushed back against his policy initiatives. Separately on Wednesday, the House approved a procedural motion that clears the way for a vote on the Ukraine Support Act, which would provide security aid to Ukraine as it fights a Russian invasion. The act reached the floor only after a petition reached a 218-signature threshold last month to move ahead. Six Republicans and one independent who normally votes with Republicans voted in favor of the Ukraine measure. Republicans recently have revolted against Trump’s plans to create a “weaponisation” fund to pay his political allies who said they had been the subject of government abuse. Republican lawmakers on Wednesday also criticized Trump’s pick of loyalist Bill Pulte — a mortgage regulator with no national security experience — to serve as acting director of national intelligence. Separation of powers Democrats have called on Trump to come to Congress for authorisation to use military force in the Iran conflict, noting that the US constitution says only the legislature, not the president, can declare war. They warned that Trump may have pulled the country into a long conflict without setting out a clear strategy and also railed against higher prices for gasoline, food and other products since the joint US-Israeli air strikes on Iran began on February 28. “The passage of this WPR today signals a significant turning point: more and more Republicans are listening to their constituents who do not want another open-ended war in the Middle East,” Representative Gregory Meeks, who sponsored the war powers resolution and serves as ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement after the vote. “This is a loud and unambiguous message to Donald Trump on behalf of the American people: it’s time to end his deeply unpopular and illegal war of choice in Iran,” the House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats posted on X. Democrats have made affordability a central theme of their economic message ahead of midterm elections in November that will decide whether Republicans keep control of Congress. US producer prices posted their biggest increase in four years in April, boosted by soaring costs for goods and services since the war began. The Trump administration insists that the war on Iran is necessary for US national security, citing an urgent need to prevent the Islamic republic from developing a nuclear weapon. Republican critics of the war powers resolutions call them political grandstanding by Democrats who want to weaken the United States and score points against Trump.
Stunning rebuke to president as lawmakers vote 215-208 for measure forcing him to seek congressional approval The US House of Representatives delivered a stunning rebuke to Donald Trump over his war on Iran on Wednesday, as representatives backed a move to force him to seek approval from Congress or withdraw US forces. The House voted 215 to 208 in favor of the war powers resolution, as four Republicans voted with Democrats. The dissident Republicans were Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Warren Davidson of Ohio and Tom Barrett of Michigan. Continue reading...
Written in breathless multilingual prose, this coming-of-age meets state-of-the-nation novel is an incredible literary performance Three twentysomethings “drive and dream of an impossible night on an endless street. moving as a massive through mad sticky traffic, destination: where else? manchester, wilmslow road, the curry mile, yo!” Thus opens Sufiyaan Salam’s high-octane debut novel, written largely in gen Z lowercase – and you’re in for a ride. The Boyz are British Pakistani friends in their early 20s. Immy is “something of a bad-boy muslim slut who don’t never text back”; Khan is “the mogul mowgli himself … the type to recite Warren Buffett epigrams like they’re hadiths”; and Haris has “a mind that never switches off, philosophy subreddits doing bares”. Each is looking for an escape – from their past, present, someone else, or themselves – and they come together for one night “cruising and bruising in a hire car towards what might just be the natural elastic endpoint of a friendship beginning to fray”. Continue reading...
O presidente dos EUA, Donald Trump, aponta o dedo durante uma reunião de gabinete na Sala do Gabinete da Casa Branca, em Washington, DC, EUA, em 27 de maio de 2026 REUTERS/Evan Vucci O governo do presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, desistiu de criar um fundo de US$ 1,8 bilhão (R$ 9 bilhões) que beneficiaria aliados políticos, incluindo apoiadores que invadiram o Capitólio em janeiro de 2021. A informação foi confirmada nesta terça-feira (2) pelo procurador-geral interino dos EUA, Todd Blanche. ✅ Siga o canal de notícias internacionais do g1 no WhatsApp O site Axios já havia informado na segunda-feira (1º) que a iniciativa havia sido abandonada. O jornal "The New York Times" e as agências Reuters e AP obtiveram a mesma informação. Batizada de "fundo anti-instrumentalização", a iniciativa sofreu uma onda de críticas. O fundo, que compensaria vítimas de "instrumentalização" política com dinheiro dos contribuintes, surgiu de um acordo judicial entre o Departamento de Justiça de Trump e a Receita Federal (IRS) para resolver um processo sem precedentes no qual o presidente buscava US$ 10 bilhões por suposta má gestão de suas declarações de imposto de renda. O anúncio gerou críticas, com parlamentares levantando preocupações sobre possíveis favorecimentos de Trump e a possibilidade de pagamentos a apoiadores violentos de Trump que invadiram o Capitólio dos EUA e agrediram policiais em 6 de janeiro de 2021. Na sexta-feira, uma juíza impediu temporariamente o governo de prosseguir com o fundo. O acordo de Trump com a IRS também levou o governo americano a abandonar auditorias e cobranças ligadas a investigações tributárias já abertas contra Trump, familiares e empresas do grupo Trump, além de prever um pedido formal de desculpas ao presidente. Fundo para aliados Segundo o procurador-geral interino Todd Blanche, o fundo criaria um processo legal para que pessoas que alegam ter sido perseguidas politicamente possam apresentar pedidos de reparação financeira. De acordo com o Departamento de Justiça, o dinheiro virá de uma reserva usada para pagar indenizações e acordos judiciais do governo federal. O fundo poderá analisar denúncias de perseguição política, emitir pedidos formais de desculpas e conceder compensações financeiras a candidatos aprovados. Uma comissão de cinco integrantes, indicada por Blanche, ficará responsável por avaliar os pedidos. O presidente terá poder para substituir membros do grupo. O programa deverá funcionar até dezembro de 2028. O governo não divulgou nomes de possíveis beneficiários nem critérios detalhados para receber indenizações. Entre os casos citados por analistas estão investigações contra aliados de Trump durante o governo do ex-presidente Joe Biden, incluindo processos ligados à invasão do Capitólio em 6 de janeiro de 2021. Mais de 1.500 pessoas foram acusadas pelos ataques. Questionado sobre a possibilidade de participantes do episódio receberem pagamentos, Trump afirmou que a decisão caberá ao comitê responsável pelo fundo. Entre aliados investigados que poderiam tentar compensação estão o ex-estrategista Steve Bannon e o ex-assessor comercial Peter Navarro, ambos condenados por desacato ao Congresso e que negam irregularidades. Por que o fundo virou alvo de críticas O presidente Donald Trump caminha para falar com repórteres enquanto se prepara para embarcar no helicóptero Marine One no gramado sul da Casa Branca, na sexta-feira, 1º de maio de 2026, em Washington Mark Schiefelbein / AP Parlamentares democratas e organizações de ética pública afirmam que o fundo pode se transformar em um mecanismo para direcionar dinheiro público a aliados políticos do presidente. A deputada Jamie Raskin, principal democrata do Comitê Judiciário da Câmara, afirmou que a medida abre caminho para a criação de um “caixa político” financiado por contribuintes. Já a senadora Elizabeth Warren classificou a iniciativa como “corrupção em nível extremo” e apresentou um projeto de lei para impedir que presidentes possam se beneficiar financeiramente de acordos com o governo. O governo Trump afirma que o fundo foi criado para reparar o que o presidente chama de uso político do Departamento de Justiça contra ele e aliados durante o governo Biden. VÍDEOS: agora no g1 Agora no g1
Judge John Chmura of Warren's 37th District for more than 30 years was arrested on March 25 after he allegedly rear ended a SMART bus with his vehicle.
Microsoft’s annual developer conference is kicking off on June 2nd in San Francisco with the keynote presentation streaming live at 12:30PM ET / 9:30AM PT, and we will be following along here with everything as it’s announced. The Verge’s Tom Warren reports that we can expect to hear about new AI models and agentic OpenClaw-like […]
Change backed by labor department would expose workers to greater financial risk, letter shared with Guardian says Congressional Democrats are strongly opposing a US Department of Labor proposal that would allow 401(k) investments to include cryptocurrency, private credit and private equity assets, arguing the change will expose workers to riskier and more complex investments. In a letter shared exclusively with the Guardian, Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren and House education and workforce committee ranking member Bobby Scott of Virginia, argued the rule would expose an estimated $14.2tn of 401(k) retirement savings to volatile assets and would probably not withstand a challenge in court. Continue reading...
Berkshire Hathaway is set to buy $10 billion of discounted Alphabet stock, and recently announced an $8.5 billion acquisition.