Ukrainska Pravda (English)
중도 성향
사회
Two civilians killed and 19 injured in Russian attacks on Kherson and Donetsk oblasts
Two people were killed and 19 others injured in Russian attacks on Kherson and Donetsk oblasts on 6 June.
"OBLASTS" · 총 11건
필터 보기현재 지수
50.3
0 = 부정 우세
50 = 중립
100 = 긍정 우세
최근 7일 기준 86,372건을 분석한 결과, 뉴스 심리지수는 50.3(균형)입니다. 긍정 4,357건(5.0%)·중립 79,975건(92.6%)·부정 2,040건(2.4%)이며, 중립 비중이 뚜렷하게 높습니다. 성향 지수는 종합 14.9(중도 균형)입니다.
Two people were killed and 19 others injured in Russian attacks on Kherson and Donetsk oblasts on 6 June.
Drones attacked temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine on the night of 6-7 June. A power plant, railway infrastructure in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, and an oil depot in Crimea came under attack.
Russian attacks on 5 June left 12 people dead and 49 injured in Donetsk and Kherson oblasts.
Ukraine's 3rd Army Corps has posted drone footage of Donbas Arena in the temporarily occupied city of Donetsk, as well as strikes on Russian forces in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.
Petrol stations in Russia's Belgorod and Kursk oblasts, as well as in temporarily occupied Luhansk Oblast, have begun restricting fuel sales.
A large-scale Russian aerial attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure has caused new power outages in Kyiv and six oblasts.
Residential areas, infrastructure and businesses have been damaged following intense attacks on Kherson, Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy oblasts.
Country: Ukraine Sources: Voluntas, World Food Programme Please refer to the attached file. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background As Ukraine enters the fifth year of the full-scale invasion, the country remains heavily affected y ongoing hostilities. As of early 2025, 3.7 million people remain internally displaced, 6.9 million are refugees abroad, and over 40,838 civilian casualties have been recorded.1 The impact is most severe in frontline oblasts such as Donetsk, Kharkiv, Kherson, Luhansk, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia.2 Continued displacement has deepened poverty, strained social protection systems, and disrupted livelihoods; particularly in rural and conflict-affected areas, where unemployment remains high.3 Social transfers, including pensions and targeted assistance to displaced people, have played a crucial role in preventing further hardship, but coverage may not be reaching hard-to-reach groups such as people without documentation, and hidden groups like Roma communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and people living with HIV/AIDS, or men avoiding military conscription.4 The psychological toll of the prolonged conflict is also g owing, with 63 percent of households reporting mental health challenges related to ongoing uncertainty and displacement.5 According to Ukraine’s 2025 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, 12.7 million people in Ukraine are in need of assistance. Among them, 45 percent are women, 30 percent are older people (60+ years old), 15 percent are children, and 14 percent have disabilities. Within this context, the humanitarian aid landscape is shifting due to funding constraints and a gradual transition from emergency relief to resilience-building efforts 7 Emergency assistance is increasingly concentrated in frontline and war-affected oblasts, while support in cent al and western Ukraine is being scaled back as international organizations shift their strategies away from short-term emergency aid toward resilience- and development-oriented programming in areas perceived as more stable.8 However, humanitarian actors have raised concerns that this shift may create gaps in assistance for vulnerable populations who continue to depend on support in these more stable areas where aid is being scaled back. As operations become more localized, humanitarian actors have also expressed concerns about the capacity of Ukraine’s social security system to take over responsibilities currently handled by international organizations . This is largely due to budget pressures, a shortage of qualified personnel, particularly in social services, and the destruction of essential facilities caused by missile strikes.9 Concerns have also been raised about the long-term sustainability of aid delivery, particularly as the war drags on and humanitarian needs continue to grow. Local organizations also worry that cross-cutting aspects of humanitarian work – such as gender equality, accountability to affected people, the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse, and disability inclusion – may be deprioritized amid international funding cuts, due to limited capacity and competing government priorities. As Ukraine navigates these ongoing challenges, a balanced approach between emergency response and long-term resilience-building is essential to ensure that basic needs are met, social tensions between recipients and non-recipients of aid are minimized, and economic recovery is supported.
Russia has attacked oil and gas infrastructure in Kharkiv and Sumy oblasts belonging to the Naftogaz Group (a Ukrainian state-run oil and gas company), with drones striking several facilities simultaneously.
Country: Ukraine Source: REACH Initiative Please refer to the attached file. Context and Rationale More than four years after the escalation of the full-scale war in Ukraine¹, the humanitarian situation across the country remains severe, with needs persisting among large segments of the population². Over time, the crisis has increasingly shifted from an acute emergency towards a more protracted and entrenched humanitarian context, as prolonged displacement³, repeated disruptions to essential services, and continued insecurity have increasingly shaped the living conditions of affected populations.⁴ While humanitarian needs have remained consistently high, their nature and underlying drivers have continued to evolve over time, reflecting the long-term consequences of a prolonged conflict and the growing strain on households and communities across Ukraine⁵. In the lead-up to the 2025-2026 winter season, Ukraine witnessed an intensification of repeated attacks targeting civilian and critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, schools, healthcare facilities, and other essential public infrastructure⁶. During the winter period, these sustained attacks resulted in a significant loss of electricity generation capacity across the country, leading to widespread planned and unplanned power outages, alongside disruptions to other essential utility services such as heating and water supply⁷. Combined with low temperatures, these disruptions further exacerbated humanitarian needs among affected populations, especially energy-related vulnerabilities across Ukraine. To monitor the evolution of humanitarian needs during the winter period, REACH Ukraine conducted the fourth round of the Calibration Assessment between January and February 2026. The assessment aimed to provide a mid-year update to the findings of the 2025 Multi-Sector Needs Assessment (MSNA)⁸ conducted in June and July, collecting updated information on humanitarian needs, reported challenges, and barriers faced by conflict-affected population, informing the humanitarian response. The assessment sought to support an understanding of how humanitarian and sectoral needs evolved over the course of the year, particularly in the context of seasonal shift and winter-related vulnerabilities. The ongoing consequences of the crisis continued to disproportionately affect frontline areas⁹, where active hostilities, insecurity, displacement, and damage to civilian infrastructure remained most severe.¹⁰ In line with this, one of the key priorities outlined in the 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan (HNRP) focused on populations residing close to the frontline. The HNRP identified approximately 3.1 million people in need of humanitarian assistance for the frontline response.¹¹ In addition, f indings from the 2025 Multi-Sector Needs Assessment (MSNA) further confirmed that both the prevalence and severity of unmet humanitarian needs correlated with proximity to the frontline, with about more than a quarter of households residing in frontline oblasts classified as being in extreme need ¹². Additionally, anticipated seasonal challenges in living conditions and exacerbation of winter-related vulnerabilities contributed to an estimated 1.7 million people being targeted for winterisation assistance during the 2025-2026 winter season. This factsheet provides an overview of humanitarian conditions in the prioritized frontline areas identified in the 2026 HNRP. It presents selected humanitarian indicators across eight frontline oblasts: Chernihivska, Dnipropetrovska, Donetska, Kharkivska, Khersonska, Mykolaivska, Sumska, and Zaporizka oblasts. Although Odeska Oblast is classified as a frontline oblast under the methodological framework, it was not included in this output because the oblast falls almost entirely within the “beyond 50 kilometres from the frontline” zone. The prioritization for this analysis focused on oblasts that also included areas located within 0 to 50 kilometres from the frontline, in order to better reflect needs among populations living in areas prioritised under the HNRP strategic focus on the most vulnerable close to the frontline.
Country: Kyrgyzstan Sources: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Kyrgyzstan Red Crescent Please refer to the attached file. Description On the night of 24–25 May 2026, heavy rainfall triggered mudflows and flash floods in Osh and Jalal-Abad Oblasts in southern Kyrgyzstan. A state of emergency was declared in Manas city (Jalal-Abad Oblast) on 25 May at 04:00. No fatalities have been reported. Cleanup and recovery operations are ongoing in both oblasts. Osh Oblast A total of 15 mudflows were recorded across the oblast, affecting 313 residential buildings: 7 social infrastructure facilities damaged (3 schools, 1 kindergarten, 2 first-aid posts, 1 hospital) 1 mosque yard and 1 store basement flooded 7 outbuildings collapsed or destroyed Livestock losses: 25 small ruminants, 1 calf, 11 chickens 19.7 hectares of cropland flooded 4 vehicles damaged (3 cars, 1 truck) Jalal-Abad Oblast — Manas City On the night of 24–25 May at approximately 23:40, torrential rain caused mudflows that flooded residential areas and infrastructure in Manas city. A state of emergency was declared at 04:00 on 25 May. As of 17:00 on 26 May: 40 residential buildings affected 8 multi-story buildings: basements and yards flooded 6 social facilities: Medical College (basement), Oblast Library (yard), JAMU Dormitory (yard), School No. 4 (yard), Driving School (yard), Kindergarten No. 1 (yard) Planned Actions (RCSK) Assessment of needs and damage in affected areas Distribution of humanitarian aid Psychosocial support (PSS) for affected families Coordination with the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic at regional level Request For Assistance Government Requests International Assistance - NS Requests International Assistance - Information Bulletin Published No Actions taken by National Society General Relief/Supply distribution Summary For Manas city: 40 hygiene kits distributed. 8 families received additional relief items (2 mattresses and 2 blankets each). Actions taken by others Osh Oblast: MES KR deployed 45 rescuers, 5 special vehicles and 10 motor pumps. Civil defense mobilized 20 personnel and 6 units of equipment. All affected roads cleared and reopened. Debris removal operations ongoing. Jalal-Abad Oblast (Manas city): State of emergency declared on 25 May at 04:00. 84 MES rescuers, 1 fire truck and 4 motor pumps deployed. 139 municipal workers with 2 excavators, 1 loader, 2 water pumping vehicles, 2 trucks and 2 buses mobilized. 52 community volunteers assisted in cleanup. Water pumped out from 8 residential yards. Total mobilized: 275 people, 18 units of equipment.