Trump surprised by Supreme Court decision to not review E. Jean Carroll case
ONP Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to review President Trump's challenge to a jury verdict awarding $5 million in damages to writer E. Jean Carroll. The jury had determined that Trump was liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the 1990s and subsequently making defamatory statements about her. With the court's refusal to intervene, the verdict stands and Trump must pay the awarded damages.
Progressive: Progressive-leaning outlets emphasize the jury's substantive judgment, explicitly stating what the jury determined about Trump's conduct. Some outlets highlight the jury's unanimity or the evidentiary standard (preponderance of evidence) that was met in reaching the verdict.
이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?
한 번의 탭으로 반응을 남겨요 · 로그인 불필요
President Trump on Monday said he was surprised by the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the verdict in the E.
Jean Carroll case, in which he was found liable for sexually abusing the writer inside a dressing room during the mid-1990s and defaming her.
“Surprisingly, the Supreme Court declined to ‘review’ a Fake Case...