Middle East expert says he does not think the ceasefire with Iran is fully over
ONP Summary
President Trump announced the cessation of the ceasefire agreement with Iran at the NATO summit after an exchange of military attacks. Iranian forces struck commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting U.S. military response against approximately 80 targets; the Trump administration also revoked Iran's oil sales license, with crude oil prices surging 5%.
Progressive: Escalation through dismissive diplomacy — Progressive outlets criticized Trump's statement dismissing negotiations as a 'waste of time' and characterized the military exchange as a dangerous escalation of conflict.
Moderate: Ceasefire collapse after military exchange — Centrist coverage reported the sequence of events: Iranian attacks on vessels, resulting U.S. military response, and Trump's declaration ending the accord.
Conservative: Justified retaliation for Iranian aggression — Conservative outlets emphasized that Iranian attacks on commercial shipping provoked Trump's military strikes and framed his decision to end negotiations as a firm stance.
U.S.
Central Command said the U.S. military is conducting a new wave of strikes on Iran at the direction of the president.
The second night of strikes came after President Trump said the fragile ceasefire between the two countries was over as far as he was concerned.
Will Todman, senior fellow for the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, has more. ...
이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?
한 번의 탭으로 반응을 남겨요 · 로그인 불필요
공식 발표 ↔ 진영별 보도
+11
+17
+13