Ford Motor Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov. The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. Notice Enter a search term or FR citation e.g. 88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN Choosing an item from full text search results will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box will also bring you to search results. Choosing an item from suggestions will bring you directly to the content. Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important. Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Transportation Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Transportation Department has reviewed them. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links has no substantive legal effect. Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day. Page views 0 as of 06/20/2026 at 12:15 am EDT Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats: This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-12401 as it appeared on Public Inspection on 06/18/2026 at 8:45 am. It was viewed 20 times while on Public Inspection. If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here. Published Document: 2026-12401 (91 FR 37225) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Receipt of petition. SUMMARY: Ford Motor Company (Ford) has determined that certain model year (MY) 2022-2025 Ford Transit motor vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and Displays. Ford filed a noncompliance report dated July 25, 2025, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA (the “Agency”) on August 13, 2025, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This document announces receipt of Ford's petition. DATES: Send comments on or before July 22, 2026. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be submitted by any of the following methods: Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except for Federal Holidays. Electronically: https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251. Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that the comments you have submitted by mail were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. All comments and supporting materials received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the fullest extent possible. When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated at the end of this notice. All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at https:// ( printed page 37226) www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown in the heading of this notice. DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kamna Ralhan, General Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (202) 366-6443. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview: Ford determined that certain MY 2022-2025 Ford Transit do not fully comply with paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101, Controls and Displays (49 CFR 571.101). Ford filed a noncompliance report dated July 25, 2025, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Ford petitioned NHTSA on August 13, 2025, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance. This notice of receipt of Ford's petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or another exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition. II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 19,341 MY 2022—2025 Ford Transit motor vehicles, manufactured between June 4, 2021, and June 25, 2025, were reported by the manufacturer. III. FMVSS Requirements: Paragraph S5.2.1. of FMVSS No. 101 includes the requirements relevant to this petition. Paragraph S5.2.1 specifies that any control, telltale or indicator that is listed in column 1 of table 1 or table 2 in FMVSS No. 101 must be indicated in the vehicle by the corresponding symbol, word, or abbreviation in columns 2 or 3 in the same tables. IV. Noncompliance: Ford explains that the subject Ford Transit vehicles were incorrectly labeled on the engine “Push To Start” (PTS) button, which fails to comply with FMVSS No. 101. The Ford Transit vehicles with an internal combustion engine (ICE) manufactured in the Kansas City Assembly Plant between June of 2021 and July of 2025 have a PTS button that is labeled “Power Start Stop” rather than “Engine Start Stop” which is required by FMVSS No. 101. V. Summary of Ford's Petition: The following views and arguments presented in this section, “V. Summary of Ford's Petition,” are the views and arguments provided by Ford. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. Ford describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. Ford states that an internal investigation and review determined that the subject Ford Transit vehicles built in the Kansas City Assembly Plant between June 4, 2021, and June 25, 2025, failed to comply with the controls identification requirements in paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101. Ford states that it was discovered that the ICE Transit vehicles had been equipped with the PTS button intended for installation in the Battery Electric and Hybrid Electric variants of the Transit model vehicles. Ford maintains two design variations of the Push to Start Button, one intended for ICE vehicles, which is labeled as “Engine Start Stop” and one intended for Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs), which is labeled as “Power Start Stop”. Ford claims that both versions of the PTS button perform the same function of turning the vehicle on and off, and are located near the steering column as required by FMVSS No. 101, and are familiar enough for drivers to understand the purpose of the control. According to tables 1 and 2 of FMVSS No 101, the PTS button on the subject vehicles' labels must contain the words “Engine Start” and “Engine Stop” when the engine control is “separate from the key locking system.” Ford cites paragraph S2 of FMVSS No. 101 in saying that the purpose of FMVSS No. 101 is to “ensure the accessibility, visibility, and recognition of controls under daylight and nighttime conditions, in order to reduce the safety hazards caused by the diversion of the driver's attention from the driving task, and mistakes in selecting the controls.” Ford provides four reasons why this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety: 1. The mislabeled PTS button still reliably functions as designed and is indicated in the owner's manual, and Ford has corrected the error that led to mislabeling the affected production vehicles. Ford states that the issue is solely a labeling matter and does not affect functionality, as the driver is still able to consistently start and stop the vehicle's engine and be alerted to the function of the button through the noise of the engine's operation. Additionally, Ford adds that they have addressed the labeling concern in production and that all Ford Transit vehicles built after June 25, 2025, will bear the compliant “Engine Start Stop” label on the PTS button. 2. The language and symbol used on the mislabeled PTS buttons are widely used and understood, and will therefore not cause confusion about the button's function to the driver of the vehicle. Ford states that the noncompliant “Power Start Stop” still clearly uses the language “Start Stop”, thus clearly indicating the purpose of the control. Ford indicates that the Owner's Manual also provides a visual depiction of the button (with the label “Engine Start Stop”) and its location, as well as a description of the function of the button. Ford states that a vehicle operator would see that the mislabeled PTS button is in the same location, has the same shape, and has the same illumination as the PTS button described in the Owner's Manual and would easily be able to infer the function of the button. Additionally, Ford stated that the term “Power” which is included within the noncompliant PTS button is commonly associated with the primary on/off function across a vast array of electronic devices and vehicle systems. The words “Power Start Stop,” particularly when displayed on a primary vehicle control, are understood by drivers to signify the action of turning the vehicle's operational power on and off. Ford further explained the “O” in “Power” for the incorrect labels has been replaced with the commonly used ISO Power On/Off symbol, regulated under ISO 2575:2010(E). Ford believes the integration of the ISO Power On/Off symbol further reinforces the control's function. The term “Power” is internationally recognized for power controls, which should enhance driver comprehension. Ford then cites a 2003 interpretation [1] by NHTSA that allowed Toyota to use the term “Power” and the ISO Power Symbol to identify the PTS button on their Hybrid Electric Vehicles. 3. Ford states that it is not aware of any reports of crashes, injuries, fatalities, or even complaints about this issue. Ford recognizes that this does not negate the possibility of risk to operators and passengers, but believes that it is an indication that customers are not confused by the discrepancy in labeling. 4. Ford provides examples where NHTSA has granted similar petitions for inconsequential noncompliance in the past and cites examples: ( printed page 37227) NHTSA granted a petition by Mack Trucks Inc. for noncompliant control identification because the control met all other FMVSS No. 101 requirements and the control's “labeling and position would be enough to avoid inducing confusion in the driver.”.[2] NHTSA granted a petition to Kawasaki Motors Corp. for motorcycles with an ignition off control that was noncompliant with the identification requirements specified in FMVSS No. 123,Motorcycle Controls and Displays.[3] Ford states that NHTSA granted the petition because “the switch's clear design reduced the likelihood for confusion or error” and the engine kill switch safety feature reduced any safety risks that might be caused by non-standard compliant labeling. Ford concludes by stating its belief that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that Ford no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after Ford notified them that the subject noncompliance existed. 2. Ford's petition cited NHTSA's Receipt of Petition Federal Register notice for the inconsequential noncompliance petition by Mack Trucks, Inc. (85 FR 58423). We believe Ford is referring to the Grant of Petition Federal Register for the Mack Trucks, Inc. petition (87 FR 23017). 3. Ford cites 86 FR 21787, but we believe they intended to cite “Kawasaki Motors Corp., Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance” 90 FR 34571, July 22, 2025.