Imposing Additional Duties to Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States with Respect to Dairy

IMPOSING ADDITIONAL DUTIES TO OFFSET CANADIAN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO DAIRY
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION
1. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338) (section 338) empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s discrimination against or unequal imposition on the commerce of the United States.
2. Canada, through discrimination or an unreasonable and unequal imposition, treats the commerce of certain foreign countries more favorably than commerce of the United States with respect to dairy and in turn, places a burden and disadvantage on the commerce of the United States. Specifically, Canada denies the commerce of the United States benefits that Canada affords to materially similar dairy commerce from certain other foreign countries and thus unreasonably burdens and disadvantages U.S. commerce compared to the commerce of certain other foreign countries.
3. Canada maintains a tariff-rate quota (TRQ) on cheeses of all types under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) as well as a TRQ on cheese of all types under the Canada-European Union (EU) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). The TRQs provide duty-free access for the covered dairy products up to specified annual quantities (in‑quota quantities) and apply a customs duty to imports that exceed the respective in-quota quantities.
4. To access the TRQs under the USMCA and the CETA, Canada’s dairy TRQ allocation measures establish eligibility criteria. But Canada does not have the same eligibility criteria for the USMCA and the CETA, disfavoring the commerce of the United States. While Canada’s eligibility criteria for the USMCA dairy TRQs — and specifically, the cheeses of all types TRQ — do not allow retailers to obtain and use TRQ quantities, the eligibility criteria for the CETA do grant retailers access to the TRQ quantity for cheese of all types.
5. By making retailers ineligible to use the USMCA TRQ for cheeses of all types, Canada discriminates against U.S. goods that are similar to EU goods that are entered pursuant to the CETA cheese of all types TRQ. Canada thus denies to the United States the favorable treatment that Canada provides to the EU and its member States. This discrimination impedes market access into Canada and results in lost sales or revenues for U.S. dairy producers and exporters, among other things. The United States, U.S. businesses and workers, and U.S. commerce are negatively affected by Canada’s discriminatory practices.
6. Accordingly, pursuant to section 338, I find as a fact that Canada is discriminating in fact against the commerce of the United States through Canada’s TRQ allocation measures imposed on U.S. cheeses of all types under the USMCA, as compared to Canada’s TRQ allocation measures imposed on EU cheese of all types under the CETA. I also find as a fact that this discrimination places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of the EU and its member States. And I find as fact that Canada’s imposition is unreasonable, is not equally enforced upon the like articles of every foreign country, and places a burden on the commerce of the United States.
7. Further, I find that imposing additional ad valorem duties on certain products of Canada to address the burden or disadvantage from this discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition is in the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States. When U.S. producers are unfairly denied export opportunities by Canada’s TRQ allocation measures, they lose sales or revenues that support production in the United States, among other things. This suppresses U.S. agricultural output as well as investment and thereby undermines employment and economic vitality in American communities. Imposing additional duties on certain products of Canada will, among other things, expand opportunities for U.S. producers to compete within the U.S. market, enhancing American production and bringing attendant economic and societal benefits, and may spur Canada to remove the discrimination against U.S. cheeses of all types.
8. Accordingly, I find that it is necessary and appropriate and in the public interest to impose an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent on certain products of Canada, as identified in Annex II to this proclamation, effective as of 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026. I determine that the additional ad valorem duties imposed in this proclamation, as described below, will offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination or unreasonable and unequal imposition. In my judgment, the action in this proclamation is consistent with the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States.
9. Section 338 authorizes the President, if he determines it will serve the public interest, to offset any burden or disadvantage placed on the commerce of the United States by an unequal imposition or discrimination by a foreign country by specifying and declaring additional duties not to exceed 50 percent ad valorem (or its equivalent) and not to take effect earlier than 30 days after the President’s proclamation finding that a foreign country imposes an unreasonable charge, exaction, regulation, or limitation that is not equally enforced on the like articles of every foreign country, or discriminates in fact against U.S. commerce in a way that places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of any foreign country. Section 338 also authorizes the President to suspend, revoke, supplement, or amend any proclamation under section 338 whenever the President deems that the public interests require such action. Further, section 338 authorizes the President to exclude products of the foreign country if the foreign country maintains or increases the discrimination against the commerce of the United States and the President deems the exclusion to be consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States.
10. Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483) (section 604), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 338; section 301 of title 3, United States Code; and section 604, do hereby proclaim as follows:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex II to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent, effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation and in Annex I to this proclamation, the duties imposed in this proclamation are in addition to any other duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such products. The duties imposed in this proclamation shall not apply to articles subject to duties pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862), or articles, excluding unmanned aircraft, subject to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.
(3) The HTSUS is modified as provided in Annex II to this proclamation, effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026, and the modifications shall continue in effect, unless this action is expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.
(4) Any product subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation, except those eligible for admission under “domestic status” as described in 19 CFR 146.43, that is subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation and that is admitted into a United States foreign trade zone on or after the effective date of this proclamation must be admitted as “privileged foreign status” as described in 19 CFR 146.41, and will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rate of duty related to the classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.
(5) The head of each executive department and agency (agency) is authorized to and shall take all appropriate measures within the agency’s authority to implement this proclamation. The head of each agency may, consistent with applicable law, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, redelegate the authority to take such appropriate measures within the agency.
(6) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, is authorized to issue such rules, regulations, guidance, instructions, or determinations as may be necessary to implement this proclamation and is authorized to take any necessary measures to administer the duties imposed in this proclamation.
(7) The Commissioner of CBP, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, and any other senior official he deems appropriate, shall determine whether any additional modifications to the HTSUS are necessary to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register, including any technical correction to the annexes to this proclamation.
(8) For any rule or regulation the Commissioner of CBP makes to implement this proclamation, the Commissioner of CBP shall, to the extent required by law, obtain the approval of the President or the United States Trade Representative. The United States Trade Representative is delegated the President’s approval authority in 19 U.S.C. 1338(h).
(9) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency. If any provision of this proclamation or the application of any provision to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.
DONALD J. TRUMP