Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics

While recent advances in large language models have enabled end-to-end automated manuscript generation, existing systems suffer from three critical deficiencies: (i) generated claims are not deterministically grounded in verifiable literature, (ii) experimental results are frequently fabricated rather than executed, and (iii) there exists no standardized, multi-dimensional framework to assess whether AI-generated manuscripts meet the quality and rigor required for real-world publication.

We present Prompt-to-Paper, a multi-agent framework that directly addresses this evaluation gap through three integrated innovations.

First, a deterministic retrieval-augmented generation pipeline with section-aware relevance scoring and snowball citation expansion grounds every claim in a verifiable corpus of 60--100 papers.

Second, an autonomous coding agent executes real computational biology experiments replacing synthetic outputs with genuine numerical results.

Third, an eight-dimensional automated quality scorer, benchmarked with approximate reference statistics from published papers and augmented with explicit hallucination penalties, provides standardized, reproducible quality assessments.

The quality-driven improvement loop uses a context-rich reviser that routes each iteration to one of three researcher actions and fires a deep research cycle every ten iterations to re-run experiments and re-manuscript from stronger outputs.

We validate the system on five bioinformatics case studies; all five cases compiled submission-formatted PDFs with zero out-of-range citations.

The improvement loop raises manuscript quality by an average of +17.96 points on a 0--100 scale (maximum +26.04.

As partial external checks, a human reviewer scored the five manuscripts at an average of 7.0 out of 10.

Complete manuscripts are produced at approximately 0.31 USD per paper.