오픈뉴스백과
홈
전체 보도

Supreme Court upholds state laws restricting transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports

50건·35개 매체·15개국
US Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender athletes in girls' and women's sports
진보 성향 29%중도 성향 32%보수 성향 39%
10개 매체11개 매체13개 매체

ONP 요약

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws from Idaho and West Virginia that restrict transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports in a 6-3 ruling written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The court rejected arguments that such bans violate the Constitution or federal education law (Title IX), overturning lower court decisions that had favored transgender athletes challenging the restrictions. The decision is expected to reinforce similar policies already enacted across more than half the country.

같은 사건, 다른 제목

같은 사건을 진영에 따라 어떻게 다르게 제목 붙였는지 비교해 보세요.

진보 성향

Trans athlete's lawyer on Supreme Court decision: "Bad for any woman"

🇺🇸 CBS News
보수 성향

The Supreme Court Didn’t Just Save Women’s Sports. It Preserved the Legal Rights of Women

🇺🇸 National Review

진영별 관점 대조

진보 성향19

ONP가 정리한 이 진영의 시각

Progressive-leaning outlets characterize the ruling as a major blow to LGBTQ and transgender rights, highlighting how the court's conservative majority has repeatedly decided against transgender Americans, while emphasizing the rejected arguments about equal protection that plaintiffs had raised.

대표 헤드라인

중도 성향12

ONP가 정리한 이 진영의 시각

Centrist outlets present the ruling factually, noting the 6-3 ideological split, the court's constitutional reasoning that state bans do not violate federal law, and the decision's broad reach across the country without prescribing a normative stance.

대표 헤드라인

보수 성향18

ONP가 정리한 이 진영의 시각

Conservative-leaning outlets emphasize the court's confirmation of state authority to regulate sports based on biological categories, with some explicitly framing the ruling as a significant cultural or political victory.

대표 헤드라인

이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?

한 번의 탭으로 반응을 남겨요 · 로그인 불필요

나의 뉴스 가치관 유형은? NVT같은 뉴스, 다른 시선 · 1분 무료 가치관 테스트해보기

학습 모드

토론 수업·수행평가 준비를 위한 정리입니다. 아래 시각 비교는 매체 보도의 강조점 차이일 뿐, 정답이 아닙니다.

논점 비교

시각 A — 진보 성향 매체의 강조점

Progressive-leaning outlets characterize the ruling as a major blow to LGBTQ and transgender rights, highlighting how the court's conservative majority has repeatedly decided against transgender Americans, while emphasizing the rejected arguments about equal protection that plaintiffs had raised.

시각 B — 보수 성향 매체의 강조점

Conservative-leaning outlets emphasize the court's confirmation of state authority to regulate sports based on biological categories, with some explicitly framing the ruling as a significant cultural or political victory.

중도 시각: Centrist outlets present the ruling factually, noting the 6-3 ideological split, the court's constitutional reasoning that state bans do not violate federal law, and the decision's broad reach across the country without prescribing a normative stance.

토론 질문

  1. "US Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender athletes in girls' and women's sports" 사건의 핵심 쟁점은 무엇이고, 누구에게 가장 큰 영향을 미칠까요?
  2. 진영에 따라 강조하는 부분이 달라진 곳은 어디이고, 왜 그렇게 다를까요?
  3. 나의 입장은 어느 쪽에 가깝고, 어떤 기사(근거)로 뒷받침할 수 있을까요?
이 페이지를 과제에 인용할 때 사용하세요. 개별 기사는 기사 페이지의 인용 버튼으로.

전개 타임라인

  1. · 18건

    Supreme Court spurns Trump on birthright citizenship, allows transgender sports bans

전체 보도 50건