Malay Mail
중도 성향
기타
Hajiji welcomes RM1.5b interim special grant for Sabah, wants swift disbursement
KOTA KINABALU, May 31 — Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Hajiji Noor has welcomed the RM1.5 billion interi...
"INTERIM" · 총 129건
필터 보기현재 지수
50.3
0 = 부정 우세
50 = 중립
100 = 긍정 우세
최근 7일 기준 79,458건을 분석한 결과, 뉴스 심리지수는 50.2(균형)입니다. 긍정 4,182건(5.3%)·중립 73,224건(92.2%)·부정 2,052건(2.6%)이며, 중립 비중이 뚜렷하게 높습니다. 성향 지수는 종합 15.3(중도 균형)입니다.
KOTA KINABALU, May 31 — Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Hajiji Noor has welcomed the RM1.5 billion interi...
The new interim report on the high-speed rail project, submitted by technocrat E. Sreedharan to the State government, envisages it as the world’s first green rail corridor
Israeli officials say Netanyahu has pushed for strikes on Iran's oil facilities.
The Tanimu Turaki-led Interim National Working Committee of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) says it will resist an attempt aimed at intimidating it. The post ‘We’ll resist intimidation,’ says Turaki-led PDP appeared first on Vanguard News.
KOTA KINABALU, May 30 — The increase in the special interim grant for Sabah, from RM600 million to RM1.5 billion,...
Menteri Sabah dan Sarawak berkata, kenaikan bayaran pemberian khas itu bukti tuntutan hak Sabah terus diberi perhatian oleh kerajaan persekutuan.
US Ambassador Sergio Gor says only 1% of the India-US interim trade deal remains, with signing expected in weeks. Both nations are deepening ties in AI, critical minerals, and pharmaceuticals.
Kadar pemberian khas kerajaan kepada Sabah sebelum ini ialah RM600 juta.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim says his administration remains committed to fulfilling the state’s revenue claim and is currently working out the details of its implementation.
KOTA KINABALU, May 30 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced that Sabah’s interim special grant...
India and the US had agreed on a framework for an interim trade arrangement in February.
“Our current interim trade agreement is on the table for us to finalise, and that will unlock prosperity for both of our countries,” says the U.S. Ambassador to India
A US team led by America’s chief negotiator is set to visit India during June 1-4 to take forward discussions aimed at concluding an interim bilateral trade deal
Iran's interim Friday prayer leader said an IRGC strike on a US base shifted the regional balance of power, citing the Pentagon's account of the ceasefire holding despite the exchange.
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has fixed June 1 for hearing the sentence suspension applications filed by human rights lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha in the social media posts case. As per a one-page written order issued by IHC’s Justice Muhammad Azam Khan, following last week’s hearing, a certified copy of the Supreme Court’s May 12 order had been submitted. It should be noted that the SC had directed the IHC on May 12 to decide within two weeks on Imaan and Hadi’s pleas seeking the suspension of their sentence. On May 20, the IHC had issued notices to officials of the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) on applications requesting an expedited hearing of the sentence suspension petitions. Earlier this month, the judge had raised objections over the non-submission of certified copies of the SC order and directed the defence counsel to submit the certified order through the court office in accordance with the prescribed procedure. Following the submission of the certified copy, the case was fixed for June 1, while the IHC’s registrar office also issued the cause list for next week’s hearing. The case Imaan and Hadi have been in jail since their arrest in January in a case registered against the two for protesting outside the IHC and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association (IHCBA) president. While the arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians, and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial, a sessions court sentenced them to 17 years in prison in the social media posts case just a day after the development. The controversy at the centre of the case stems from a complaint filed on August 12, 2025, by the NCCIA Islamabad assistant director (investigating officer) before the Cybercrime Reporting Centre, FIA, under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016 (Peca). The complaint accused Imaan of disseminating and “propagating narratives that align with hostile terrorist groups and proscribed organisations”, while her husband was implicated for reposting some of her posts. In January, the sessions court sentenced the duo to 10 years’ imprisonment under Section 10 (cyber terrorism), five years’ imprisonment under Section 9 (glorification of an offence) and two years’ imprisonment under Section 26-A (false and fake information) of Peca. In December 2025, the couple moved the SC to overturn the IHC’s decision refusing interim relief in the case. The appeal was filed against a December 1 IHC order that denied ad-interim relief of staying the trial without a just legal cause. In her appeal, Imaan argued that the high court had “erroneously and illegally refused” to exercise the discretion to grant ad-interim relief to the petitioners to stay the criminal trial, as recording of evidence before the trial court in their absence was not only a violation of Section 353 CrPC, but also their due process and fair trial rights under Article 10A of the Constitution. On May 11, their counsel submitted additional documents to the SC in relevance to the appeal, consisting of the charge sheets of different dates against the petitioners, their statements before the trial court and the orders issued by the court. The petitioners pleaded before the SC to allow bringing these documents on record in the interest of justice since they were “essential and relevant for adjudication of the present case”. They explained that the said documents were not available at the time of filing the appeal, since the paper books were not prepared by the office of the IHC; the trial record was obtained after filing the appeals. On April 30, the duo had moved another appeal in the SC, seeking an early hearing of their pleas against their conviction. Moved under Article 185(3) of the Constitution, the application requested the grant of leave to appeal against the Feb 19 IHC order. Through that order, the IHC had admitted the appeal against the trial court’s Jan 24 decision of handing down a 17-year sentence to the couple. And while it had issued notices to the respondents on the application for the suspension of sentence, it had not suspended the sentence. The petition contended that the appeals be accepted and the sentence awarded to the petitioners through the impugned trial court’s judgement be suspended till the disposal of the criminal appeal pending before the IHC.
Carlton goes for a third win in a row under interim coach Josh Fraser, as the Blues take on the high-flying Geelong at the MCG. Follow live.
United States President Donald Trump finds himself in a bind as he seeks to end the war against Iran: he is under pressure to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and get US gasoline prices down, but at the same time faces a potential backlash from Iran hawks in his own party over any concessions to Tehran. Trump’s dilemma became clear during a week of hectic diplomacy marked by word of an emerging framework deal that, according to sources familiar with the matter, would extend a current ceasefire and release Iran’s stranglehold on the vital oil-shipping route while deferring discussions of its nuclear programme. Such an interim agreement, if approved by Trump and Iran’s rulers, would amount to the most significant step toward peace since he joined with Israel in attacking Iran on February 28, and could ease the soaring energy prices the conflict has triggered. But it could also draw the disapproval of a key segment of Trump’s base — influential Republicans clamouring for him to “finish the job” by resuming strikes to close Tehran’s path to a nuclear weapon, his main stated reason for going to war. Earlier this week, some of Trump’s hardline anti-Iran allies responded to reports of a possible deal with criticism, even arguing that he might gain little beyond the 2015 Iran nuclear deal negotiated by former president Barack Obama and scrapped by Trump during his first term. Senior Republicans rarely at odds with Trump, including Senators Lindsey Graham, Roger Wicker and Ted Cruz, urged the president not to compromise. Trump pushed back, insisting he was in “no rush” and would only accept a “great” agreement. Caught between the competing demands — a quick solution to high gas prices and an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions — the president has little room to manoeuvre. “Trump’s rhetorical swings and abrupt reversals of the past week suggest a president trying to park a wide war in a tight spot,” said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East expert at Johns Hopkins University. A White House official said that “negotiations are proceeding nicely and he has made his redlines clear”. “President Trump will only make a good deal for the American people, which must ensure that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” the official said on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters. Unanswered questions Leaks to the media on Thursday about the terms of the “memorandum of understanding (MoU)“ suggest the proposed deal leaves many of the thorniest questions unanswered. Those include what the strait’s long-term status will be, what will happen to Iran’s stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium and the details of potential sanctions relief. The emerging framework, while averting military escalation, would at this stage fall far short of Trump’s earlier demand for “unconditional surrender” and his vow to dismantle Iran’s nuclear programme. Iran has insisted it is only for peaceful purposes. “If these terms are accurate and if a deal is concluded, the Islamic Republic appears to be getting more in the MOU than the US,” Jason Brodsky, policy director of United Against Nuclear Iran, a nonprofit policy organisation, said on X. “A pledge for more nuclear talks? Be wary.” Iran’s Tasnim news agency said the text of the agreement had not been finalised. Trump has several times before said a deal was close, and there was no guarantee that the latest effort would succeed where others have not. This week’s diplomatic flurry has played out against the backdrop of a fresh but limited exchange of strikes that has strained the fragile truce between the US and Iran. Analysts say Trump appears to be trying to find a balance between getting Iran to give ground on key issues while in return offering only limited compromises that will still allow him to frame the outcome as a win. Getting the strait reopened would be welcomed internationally, but Trump would just be regaining the free flow of shipping that existed before he started the war. Meanwhile, the political and economic clocks are ticking for the president, whose public approval ratings have hit new lows. Midterm elections are looming in November, with his fellow Republicans struggling to maintain control of Congress, and new assessments suggest that if the conflict continues, there will be deep damage to the global economy. Trump dismisses midterms Iran appears to be seeking some easing of sanctions up-front to boost its crippled economy, which Trump critics fear he may be unable to resist in pursuit of a war-ending deal. But at a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Trump seemed to respond to his critics by reiterating maximalist positions and insisting he didn’t care about the midterms. His aides have privately expressed concern that high gasoline prices could damage Republicans’ electoral prospects. Iran has shown it is confident it has the upper hand, having proved it can survive the military onslaught and throttle one fifth of the world’s oil supplies, analysts say. “The president gives every sign of wanting this over soon,“ said Jon Alterman of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank. That makes the Iranians dig in their heels. The past week’s whiplash was nothing new for a president who campaigned promising to stay out of unnecessary wars, only to take the US into a foreign entanglement without clearly articulating the rationale. How he decides to end the conflict is expected to be a major factor in defining his second-term foreign policy legacy, analysts say.
The court, however, issued notice on the petition and directed the Centre and X to file a “comprehensive affidavit”.
The Delhi HC found some content posted on Cockroach Janata Party's X to be “slightly offensive”, and refused to grant interim relief on the plea by its founder.
Following a dismal IPL 2026, Mumbai Indians face intense captaincy speculation. Fans overwhelmingly favor pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah to lead in 2027, with Rohit Sharma also a strong contender. Bumrah's successful interim captaincy stint and the team's continued title drought fuel the debate for a leadership revival.