"Disturbing Lawful Meeting" Doesn't Need to Be "Substantial" to Be Criminal, at Least if a "Purpose to โฆ Disrupt" Is Shown
So holds the Ohio Court of Appeals, interpreting the Ohio disturbing-lawful-meeting statute.
๐บ๐ธ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ยท "STATUTE" ยท ์ด 4๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
50.0
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 11,534๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 50.0(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 1๊ฑด(0.0%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 11,532๊ฑด(100.0%)ยท๋ถ์ 1๊ฑด(0.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 18.8(์ค๋ ๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค.
So holds the Ohio Court of Appeals, interpreting the Ohio disturbing-lawful-meeting statute.
It is bad enough that Californiaโs stringent environmental laws have driven up the cost of energy, food, and housing. Now, public-sector unions are weaponizing the stateโs most powerful environmental statute to avoid showing up for work. Getting Californiaโs unionized state workforce back into the office has been a challenge ever since the COVID lockdowns ended. [โฆ]
If more of our fellow citizens understood the contributions immigrants make, we might once again proudly recite the words emblazoned on the Statute of Liberty: โGive me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.โ
Federal agencies repeatedly govern Americans through documents that are not supposed to carry the force of law. In theory, these โguidance documentsโ should merely explain how an agency is interpreting existing statutes and regulations. In practice, however, they often function as a shortcut around the lawmaking and rulemaking processes. That should concern anyone who cares [โฆ]