๐บ๐ธ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ยท "POSTMARK" ยท ์ด 4๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
48.8
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 11,652๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 48.8(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 1,146๊ฑด(9.8%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 8,382๊ฑด(71.9%)ยท๋ถ์ 2,124๊ฑด(18.2%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 22.2(๋ณด์ ๊ฒฝํฅ)์ ๋๋ค.
With the flood of late-arriving mail-in ballots having helped propel Raman into second place, it's worth looking at one of the state's more questionable election procedures.
The race has once again drawn rightful attention to California's insecure and curious mail-in ballot rules.
At least 14 states and the District of Columbia allow for late mail-in ballots so long as envelopes are postmarked by Election Day.
While Tuesday marks Election Day in California, the results for races across the state may not come in for days, or even weeks. In the Golden State, mail-in ballots are valid so long as they are postmarked by Election Day and arrive to county election offices by June 9. Voters in California can also return...