๐บ๐ธ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ยท "CLERICAL" ยท ์ด 3๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
48.8
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 12,826๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 48.8(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 1,308๊ฑด(10.2%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 9,136๊ฑด(71.2%)ยท๋ถ์ 2,382๊ฑด(18.6%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 22.0(๋ณด์ ๊ฒฝํฅ)์ ๋๋ค.
The U.S.-Israeli strikes have degraded the state apparatus of Iran, but the clerical regime has endured the onslaught. Meanwhile, despite the weakening of the regime, the anti-regime opposition has been unable to seize the moment and spark revolutionary upheaval inside Iran. This scenario underscores a gap in the United Statesโs strategic calculus pertaining to the [โฆ]
From the 1979 hostage crisis to today's nuclear talks, Iran's clerical regime plays the long game, and Washington keeps misreading Tehran's intentions.
The US launched self-defense strikes on Iranian radar strikes in response to โaggressionโ shown by the clerical regime โ while Tehran says it retaliated by striking an air base used by the US amid talks to end the three-month-old war.