🇵🇰 파키스탄 · "PETE" · 총 59건
필터 보기현재 지수
50.0
0 = 부정 우세
50 = 중립
100 = 긍정 우세
최근 7일 기준 894건을 분석한 결과, 뉴스 심리지수는 50.0(균형)입니다. 긍정 1건(0.1%)·중립 892건(99.8%)·부정 1건(0.1%)이며, 중립 비중이 뚜렷하게 높습니다. 성향 지수는 종합 0.0(중도 균형)입니다.
It is not uncommon for brides to have wedding jitters, but the thought of marrying into the royal family could raise the nervousness many-folds. This did not seem to be the case for Peter Phillips bride on Saturday, who appeared every bit confident while exuding elegance as she walked...
King Charles and Queen Camilla arrived at All Saints Church in Kemble, a village in the Cotswold district of Gloucestershire, on Saturday to attend the wedding of nephew Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling. The royal couple joined members of the royal family including the Prince and...
Workers at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles have overwhelmingly voted to authorise a potential strike during the World Cup, just days before football’s global showpiece begins. The Unite Here Local 11 union, which represents about 2,000 stadium food and beverage workers, is demanding better pay along with assurances that federal immigration agents will not be allowed to enter the venue. A whopping 96 per cent of voters approved the strike call, meaning they have the green light to walk off the job at any time, with the World Cup due to open on Thursday. “Contract negotiations with stadium food service operator Legends Global and FIFA have not had significant progress on key economic and workplace safety issues,” the union said in a statement. New talks are scheduled for Monday, ahead of the first World Cup match on US soil on June 12 at SoFi. Cooks, dishwashers, bartenders, and others are represented by Unite Here. SoFi Stadium — the world’s most expensive sports venue, which opened in 2020 at a cost exceeding $5 billion — will host eight World Cup matches. “If we’re forced to strike, those $100,000 FIFA suites will have nothing but bottled water and Doritos,” said union co-president Kurt Petersen. The union has demanded that workers be allowed to walk out if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel come to SoFi during World Cup matches and create “a reasonable fear for their safety.” ICE has faced sharp criticism from human rights organizations for their sometimes brutal raids in various US cities, including Los Angeles. Stadium workers have also expressed concerns about being forced to share their personal information with FIFA, football’s world governing body, to get World Cup accreditation — amid fears that data will be shared with ICE. “The FIFA World Cup will generate enormous profits, but we are still fighting for basic respect and security,” stadium bartender Cesar Zamora said in a statement provided by the union. “We deserve better, and if that means going on strike, I’m ready. “
Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling finally turned their prayers and dreams into vows, despite the crisis along the way. The King’s nephew and Princess Anne’s son stamped his vows with a kiss on his partner’s lips as the newlyweds emerged from the church after...
Prince William, Princess Beatrice laugh off feud rumours with one gesture Peter Phillip's wedding to Harriet Sperling proved a good omen for the royal family, answering many questions about royal bonding and feud speculation that swirled after Andrew's scndals. Undoubtedly,...
Prince William and Princess Kate share one common thing with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle despite their ongoing their rift. As the royal family is gathering for the wedding of Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling, it was noted that even though the Prince and Princess of Wales had...
Harriet Sperling’s bridal close-up moment has already captured attention, with her elegant presence some are now calling a potential new royal style phenomenon. As the newest addition to the wider Royal Family circle through her marriage to Peter Phillips, Harriet’s appearance...
Princess Kate and William bring fairytale romance to Peter Phillips’ big day Prince William and Princess Kate stole the spotlight as they arrived for the wedding of Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling on Saturday. The Prince and Princess of Wales are typically known for their...
Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie shocked royal fans as they attended their cousin Peter Phillips wedding alongside their husbands day after bombshell revelation about their royal palaces. The princess Yorks and their husband were seen arriving at Peter Phillips and Harriet...
Prince Harry skipped his cousin Peter Phillips' wedding in the UK after an incident that had left the Duke frustrated at the first wedding some 18 years ago. Princess Anne's son Peter, 48, is marrying NHS nurse Harriet Sperling, 45, in a more private affair at All Saints Church,...
Ahead Harriet Sperling and Peter Phillips wedding at All Saints Church in Kemble, a final rehearsal took place as Peter’s daughters, Savannah and Isla Phillips, sister Zara Tindall, and Harriet’s daughter Georgina joined in.
Royal expert’s take on Peter Phillips’s wedding: Expect the unexpected Senior royals will show off their elegance at the first royal wedding since Princess Beatrice's 2020 ceremony. A royal expert believes this one will be different from the rest.` Peter Phillips...
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has set aside the government’s decision to deny foreign postings to several selected Trade and Investment Officers, ruling that executive authorities cannot deprive individuals of accrued rights on the basis of undisclosed intelligence reports that are neither shared with the affected persons nor produced before the court. In a detailed 26-page judgement, Justice Raja Inaam Ameen Minhas declared unlawful the Ministry of Commerce’s decision to withhold the appointments of successful candidates solely on the basis of adverse assessments attributed to the Intelligence Bureau (IB). The petitioners were represented by advocates Kashif Ali Malik, Barrister M. Saad Buttar, and Syed Hasnain Ibrahim Kazmi, who argued that the government could not reverse a completed merit-based selection process through secret vetting reports that were never disclosed to the candidates. They maintained that the petitioners had acquired vested rights after obtaining approval from the competent authority and completing all mandatory requirements for foreign postings. Selected candidates had completed tests, interviews, training, pre-departure formalities The dispute arose from the recruitment process for Trade and Investment Officers for Pakistan’s trade missions abroad, initiated in December 2024. According to the record, the candidates successfully cleared written examinations, psychometric assessments, and interviews. They received approval from the prime minister, completed mandatory training, and fulfilled all pre-departure formalities. Despite completing every stage of the process, several officers were denied final appointment letters after being declared “not suitable for posting abroad” by a special vetting agency. The court observed that the commerce ministry itself was unaware of the reasons behind the adverse recommendations and had acted merely on a bare conclusion communicated by the IB. Published in Dawn, June 6th, 2026
WASHINGTON: The US Congress is moving to tighten oversight of Pentagon leadership decisions and limit unilateral military action against Iran, in a rare bipartisan effort that underscores renewed tensions over presidential war powers and civilian control of the military. On Thursday, the House Armed Services Committee adopted a bipartisan provision that would require the Pentagon to notify Congress within five days whenever a senior military officer is dismissed, along with a written explanation for the decision. Lawmakers say the measure is intended to improve transparency over personnel changes at the top levels of the armed forces, where congressional visibility has traditionally been limited. The move comes amid broader scrutiny on Capitol Hill of the Trump administration’s handling of military operations against Iran and recent changes in senior defence leadership. While Congress frequently debates executive war powers, bipartisan agreement on measures that directly constrain presidential military authority is uncommon in a sharply divided Washington. On Wednesday, the House of Representatives also adopted a War Powers resolution aimed at limiting the president’s ability to continue military operations against Iran without congressional authorisation. The measure reflects growing interest among lawmakers in reasserting legislative authority over sustained military action under the 1973 War Powers framework, which requires congressional consultation when operations extend beyond defined time limits. The latest resolution, introduced by Democratic Representative Pat Ryan, passed on Thursday by voice vote without objection, signalling unusual bipartisan consensus on an issue that has historically divided Congress along party lines. The push for greater oversight has been fuelled in part by reports that US War Secretary Pete Hegseth has dismissed roughly two dozen senior military officers since taking office. Some lawmakers in both parties have questioned both the scale of the removals and the absence of public explanations for the decisions. Scrutiny intensified further after the removal of Army Chief of Staff General Randy George, a highly regarded officer with more than four decades of service. Republican Congressman Steve Womack described Gen George as a “patriotic American,” reflecting unease within parts of the Republican caucus over the decision. While civilian control of the military is a core principle of US governance, lawmakers have raised concerns in hearings about whether recent personnel changes have been accompanied by sufficient transparency to Congress, particularly at a time of heightened military activity in the Middle East. The new reporting requirement still faces a long legislative path, needing approval by both chambers of Congress and the president’s signature. But its advancement at the committee level, alongside the War Powers resolution, signals a cautious but notable shift in congressional willingness to assert oversight over both military operations and senior Pentagon personnel decisions. Even so, Republican lawmakers remain broadly supportive of the administration’s defence posture, suggesting that the emerging push for oversight is more focused on process and transparency than on a fundamental break with the White House’s military policy.
Princess Anne may have royal surprise for Peter Phillips’s bride Princess Anne, who continued her royal duty until the last day of her beloved son's wedding to Harriet Sperling, may have a special surprise for her new daughter-in-law. Harriet may be hounoured with a tiara by...
Prince Harry shocks fans with Peter Phillips wedding decision Is Prince Harry joining the royals at Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling's wedding? Well, there is a shocking revelation made. There were talks surrounding an invitation being sent or not being sent to the Duke of Sussex and...
Princess Anne's son wedding preparation takes surprise turn Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling's wedding venue has been closed just day before the cermany as preprations enter in final phase. On Wednesday, a notice was fixed to the gate of the vanue to inform the public of the...
Princess Anne's son wedding prepration takes surprise turn Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling's wedding venue has been closed just day before the cermany as preprations enter in final phase. Princess Anne's son and his girlfriend are set to tie the knot on June 6 at All Saints'...
WASHINGTON: Three senior Democratic leaders urged their colleagues in the US Senate on Thursday to support the move to prevent President Donald Trump from continuing the war against Iran without congressional approval. Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said in a joint statement that the House of Representatives on Wednesday “successfully passed a War Powers Resolution” and that it is “now time for Senate Republicans to do the right thing.” They reminded Republican lawmakers that the Iran war has now lasted more than 90 days. The 90-day period is significant because a US law designed to limit a president’s ability to wage war requires the “president to seek authorisation from Congress if military operations continue beyond that timeframe”. The statement comes as the legislation moves into the Senate, where lawmakers are expected to decide whether to take up and pass a companion measure or adopt the House-passed version directly. The resolution is part of a broader congressional effort under the War Powers Resolution framework, which allows Congress to challenge or limit sustained military operations initiated without explicit authorisation. What happens next in the Senate The immediate next step is a Senate floor process. The chamber will likely debate and vote on a version of the resolution, following earlier procedural votes that allowed similar measures to advance. Several senators from both parties have previously supported moving the legislation forward, increasing the likelihood of formal consideration. However, significant uncertainty remains over final passage. Republican leadership has generally opposed restricting the president’s wartime authority, arguing that such measures could interfere with ongoing military and diplomatic operations. At the same time, Democrats are unified in pushing for congressional oversight of any continued military engagement with Iran. Expected outcome after Congress Even if the Senate approves the resolution, it is expected to face a presidential veto from President Donald Trump. The administration has argued that congressional restrictions would undermine national security decision-making and limit executive flexibility during an active conflict. Overriding a veto would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, a threshold that current political alignments make highly unlikely. Although the measure faces steep procedural and political hurdles, its advancement reflects renewed tensions between Congress and the White House over war-making authority. Regardless of its final fate, the debate underscores ongoing disputes about the limits of presidential power in authorising and sustaining military operations abroad.
William, Kate to attend Peter Phillips’ wedding as Harry left off guest list The future British monarch, Prince William, and his wife, Princess Kate will attend Peter Phillips' wedding reception on Saturday, June 6. William, 43, and Kate, 44, are believed to be going to both the...