India Today
์ค๋ ์ฑํฅ
๊ธฐํ
Have some shame and spine: Mahua Moitra slams Yusuf Pathan as TMC MPs rebel
Have some shame and spine: Mahua Moitra slams Yusuf Pathan as TMC MPs rebel
๐ฎ๐ณ ์ธ๋ ยท "SHAME" ยท ์ด 10๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
50.0
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 5,145๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 50.0(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 5,145๊ฑด(100.0%)ยท๋ถ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 11.9(์ค๋ ๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค.
Have some shame and spine: Mahua Moitra slams Yusuf Pathan as TMC MPs rebel
Mahua Moitra calls TMC rebels "greedy self serving traitors" for backing NDA, targets Yusuf Pathan over Delhi visit.
Arsenal star midfielder Declan Rice has always defended his girlfriend, Lauren Fryer, as she got mocked by millions over her appearance ovee the last few years as many shamed her. With Declan Rice eyeing the World Cup 2026, his personal life has continued to dominate headlines. Amid all the mess, the Arsenalโs star playerโs remarks about Lauren Fryer being jealous have sparked chaos.
The opposition parties raised concerns against the ruling BJP in Delhi, and questioning the frequency of such incidents in the Capital.
Vickrum Digwa lied to the police about being the victim of a racist attack
Attack came in response to Mr. Sibal's remarks on May 31 that he was ashamed to live in a country where the party in power would use any means to destroy the foundations of democracy, referring to the attack on TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee
BJP has strongly criticized Congress MP Kapil Sibal for his remarks on democracy, accusing him of "hating India" and selectively ignoring violence. Sibal's comments followed an alleged attack on TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee in West Bengal. The BJP questioned Sibal's silence on past incidents while criticizing the ruling party.
"I'm ashamed that I'm living in a country where this is what happens," says Sibal. BJP responds, "You abuse the nation just because you have a problem with the BJP."
The Trump administration said it will appeal a judgeโs authority to order across-the-board refunds of all tariffs ruled illegal by the US Supreme Court, potentially injecting legal chaos into a claims process thatโs already underway.The Justice Department filed notice on Friday that it will appeal a court order compelling customs authorities to recalculate all import taxes that the administration collected under President Donald Trumpโs use of a 1970s-era emergency powers law.Also read: US says $20.6 billion of tariff refunds on the way to importersUS Customs and Border Protection launched a new online portal to process refund claims on April 20, signaling that it intended to repay at least some of the approximately $166 billion in levies struck down by the Supreme Court earlier this year. But even as the administration has moved forward with that plan, the Justice Department declined to concede that a judge could exercise nationwide power to oversee the process, leaving open the possibility of another legal fight. โFor that reason, defendants intend to appeal the courtโs universal injunction and to seek a stay of the injunction except as to the particular importer plaintiffs in each case in which the Court has entered the injunction,โ the Justice Department said in the court filing Friday.In a 6-3 decision in February, the Supreme Court held that Trumpโs use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to impose sweeping global tariffs was unlawful. They were silent on the question of refunds, however, sending the litigation back to the US Court of International Trade in Manhattan to determine next steps. Trade Judge Richard Eaton, appointed under former President Bill Clinton, was assigned to preside over thousands of lawsuits importers filed seeking to recoup the taxes they had paid before the Supreme Court ruled. Eaton ordered the customs agency to recalculate tariff amounts for all importers who paid the contested levies, not just the companies that had sued. The government also committed to paying interest on any refunds.Uncertainty has loomed about whether officials would oppose repaying the full amount. Eaton has mostly held non-public court hearings to discuss the governmentโs progress, but he indicated in a public order there was disagreement about how to handle tariffs that became final, a process that happens automatically on a rolling basis.Also read: US companies, shamed by Trump, tiptoe into $166 billion tariff refund race A customs official had also disclosed in court filings that the first phase of the refund portal roll-out wouldnโt be able to handle a significant proportion of the import entries at issue, and didnโt provide a concrete schedule for expanding the systemโs capabilities to deal with more complicated claims.Trump, meanwhile, lambasted the Supreme Courtโs decision and suggested that companies that didnโt seek refunds could reap political benefits in the future, saying that he would โremember them.โSeparate from the IEEPA legal wrangling, the Trump administration is before the trade court defending a new round of global tariffs that the president imposed under a different law shortly after he lost in the Supreme Court.A three-judge panel declared the policy unlawful. But a federal appeals court temporarily paused that ruling while it weighs the governmentโs request for a longer-term order allowing customs authorities to continue collecting the levies as the court fight proceeds.
West Bengal BJP Chief Shamik Bhattacharya vows Tata will return, calls Singur exit shameful, links pledge to BJPs 100 day industrial revival plan and business friendly reforms