India Today
์ค๋ ์ฑํฅ
์ฌํ
UK teen murder not about Sikkhism, Sikh MPs clarify as kirpan row intensifies
UK teen murder not about Sikkhism, Sikh MPs clarify as kirpan row intensifies
๐ฎ๐ณ ์ธ๋ ยท "CLARIFY" ยท ์ด 11๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
50.0
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 6,194๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 50.0(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 6,194๊ฑด(100.0%)ยท๋ถ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 0.0(์ค๋ ๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค.
UK teen murder not about Sikkhism, Sikh MPs clarify as kirpan row intensifies
Warning that the issue had implications for Opposition unity, CPI-Mโs M.A. Baby says the Congress leadership must โclear the airโ on what he termed โdisruptive movesโ before the June 8 INDIA bloc meeting
Officials say appointments were made strictly on merit and in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines, G.O.Ms. No. 77 and reservation norms; clarify implementation of horizontal reservations, disability quota and sports quota selections
Former Finance Minister asks Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan to clarify whether the document was indeed AI-generated, and whether sensitive data from the Secret Section of the Finance department was released externally and analysed using such tools
The CBI meticulously recreated the crime scene at former judge Giribala Singh's residence, employing dummies and sacks to reconstruct the events surrounding Twisha Sharma's death. This crucial step aims to pinpoint discrepancies and clarify the incident's circumstances. Singh, now in CBI custody after her anticipatory bail was revoked, is undergoing intensive questioning as the investigation progresses.
The court attempted to clarify what India's anti-trafficking laws were originally meant to target - commercial exploitation of vulnerable people rather than prostitution itself.
Lawmakers from the Nepali Congress and the Nepal Communist Party demanded that the Prime Minister clarify where exactly Nepal has encroached upon Indian territory and sought the removal of his remarks from the record.
New Delhi [India]: The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed a penalty of Rs 7 lakh on Vajiram and Ravi IAS Study Centre LLP for allegedly publishing misleading advertisements and concealing material information related to the success of candidates in the UPSC Civil Services Examination (CSE).According to a press release issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, the final order was passed by the CCPA, headed by Chief Commissioner Nidhi Khare and Commissioner Anupam Mishra, after the authority found that the coaching institute had prominently advertised the achievements of successful UPSC CSE 2023 candidates without disclosing the specific courses undertaken by those candidates.According to the press release, the institute had claimed on its official website that "8 Rank Holders in the Top 10 are from Vajiram & Ravi", "37 Rank Holders in the Top 50 are from Vajiram & Ravi", and that "more than 30 per cent of the officers selected through UPSC Civil Services Examination are students of Vajiram & Ravi" every year.The CCPA's investigation reportedly found that seven of the eight top-10 rank holders and 29 of the 37 candidates in the top 50 had enrolled only in the institute's free Interview Guidance Programme (IGP).Also Read: Nearly 5.49 lakh candidates appeared in civil services preliminary exam: UPSCThe authority further noted that a large majority of successful candidates associated with the institute in recent years had participated only in the IGP. According to the findings cited in the press release, 86.36 per cent of successful candidates in 2021, 78.31 per cent in 2022, 97.56 per cent in 2023, and 71.69 per cent in 2024 had enrolled solely in the interview guidance programme.The CCPA observed that the Interview Guidance Programme begins only after candidates independently clear the Preliminary and Mains stages of the UPSC examination. By featuring such candidates in advertisements for comprehensive coaching programmes without clarifying the nature of their enrolment, the institute allegedly created the impression that their success was attributable to its full-length coaching courses.The authority held that the non-disclosure of important information regarding the courses opted for by successful candidates amounted to a misleading advertisement under Section 2(28)(iv) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and violated consumers' right to be informed under Section 2(9) of the Act, the release said.The press release stated that the CCPA has so far issued more than 60 notices to coaching institutes for misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices and has imposed penalties exceeding Rs 1.46 crore on coaching centres preparing students for examinations such as UPSC, IIT-JEE, NEET, RBI and other competitive tests.
Drug regulators are launching surprise audits of salons, spas, and massage centres to crack down on the administration of injectables and subcutaneous devices by unqualified workers. The move follows a DCGI directive clarifying that any needle-based treatment constitutes a medical intervention.
The Supreme Court upheld the SIR, clarifying that the Election Commission's scrutiny is limited to electoral rolls and cannot assume finality on the question of citizenship.
SFI state secretary P.S. Sanjeev said that the University Syndicate had rolled back the order following protests by the SFI