Top court draws red lines for AI in courts in draft regulations
Supreme Court proposes regulations on AI in courts, banning AI for decision-making, requiring disclosure of AI assistance by lawyers.
๐ฎ๐ณ ์ธ๋ ยท IT/๊ธฐ์ ยท "REGULATION" ยท ์ด 4๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
50.0
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 5,658๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 50.0(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 5,658๊ฑด(100.0%)ยท๋ถ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 0.0(์ค๋ ๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค.
Supreme Court proposes regulations on AI in courts, banning AI for decision-making, requiring disclosure of AI assistance by lawyers.
Europe is forging ahead with ambitious plans to break free from reliance on US and Chinese technology, particularly in critical sectors like AI and microchips. New regulations aim to bolster "tech sovereignty" by ensuring sensitive data remains within the EU and boosting domestic semiconductor production, safeguarding against foreign digital threats and supply chain disruptions.
Court says broadcasters cannot claim an โunfettered right to exploit spectrum for commercial purposesโ, adding that โexcessive or uneven commercial intrusion is a direct impairment of the right of consumers to a fair and reasonable viewing experienceโ
India is not a fringe crypto market. It is central to the global landscape with over 120 million users.