Top court draws red lines for AI in courts in draft regulations
Supreme Court proposes regulations on AI in courts, banning AI for decision-making, requiring disclosure of AI assistance by lawyers.
๐ฎ๐ณ ์ธ๋ ยท IT/๊ธฐ์ ยท "COURTS" ยท ์ด 3๊ฑด
ํํฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐํ์ฌ ์ง์
50.0
0 = ๋ถ์ ์ฐ์ธ
50 = ์ค๋ฆฝ
100 = ๊ธ์ ์ฐ์ธ
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค 6,051๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ด์ค ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง์๋ 50.0(๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)ยท์ค๋ฆฝ 6,051๊ฑด(100.0%)ยท๋ถ์ 0๊ฑด(0.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋น์ค์ด ๋๋ ทํ๊ฒ ๋์ต๋๋ค. ์ฑํฅ ์ง์๋ ์ข ํฉ 0.0(์ค๋ ๊ท ํ)์ ๋๋ค.
Supreme Court proposes regulations on AI in courts, banning AI for decision-making, requiring disclosure of AI assistance by lawyers.
SC issues draft AI rules for courts, allowing AI for research and administration but banning it from decisions, mandates disclosure, audits, data safeguards and human primacy.
JD.Com's founder pledged to protect its 900,000 employees from AI-driven job losses, emphasizing safeguarding front-line workers. This comes as China's courts warn companies against using AI to replace staff. Meanwhile, the e-commerce giant is reportedly eyeing a significant acquisition in the UK's online retail sector.