Position Bias Correction is Insufficient for One-Pass Attention Sorting

Long-context language models suffer from position bias, where information in middle positions is underutilized.

Attention Sorting addresses this by iteratively reordering documents based on attention patterns, but its multiple sort-and-generate cycles increase deployment cost.

We hypothesize that position bias is the primary bottleneck and propose Debiased One-Pass Attention Sorting, which estimates a per-prompt position-bias curve from the low-attention majority of documents and uses it to correct raw attention scores (via subtraction or division) to enable single-pass sorting.

Our experiments on two models refute this hypothesis in the tested setting: on LLaMA-2-7B-32K-Instruct, debiasing produces identical results to uncalibrated single-pass sorting (94.83\% containment accuracy), while on YaRN-Llama-2-7b-64k, debiasing improves accuracy by 8.67 percentage points but remains 14.84pp behind iterative sorting, closing only 37\% of the gap.

These results suggest that position-bias correction is insufficient to match iterative sorting, and that repeated reordering provides additional benefits beyond bias correction.