research
중도 성향
The fundamental problem of risk prediction for individuals: health AI, uncertainty, and personalized medicine
arXiv Stat
조회 0
CC BY
이 매체는 공공·자유 라이선스로 본문을 직접 표시합니다.Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 20 Jun 2025 (v1), last revised 1 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]
Title:The fundamental problem of risk prediction for individuals: health AI, uncertainty, and personalized medicine
View PDFAbstract:Background and Objective: Clinical prediction models are commonly evaluated regarding performance for a population, although decisions are made for individuals. The classic view relates uncertainty in risk estimates for individuals to sample size (estimation uncertainty) while other sources are model uncertainty (variability in modeling choices) and applicability uncertainty (variability in measurement procedures and between populations). We aim to illustrate the uncertainty of prediction models in estimating individual risks with an ovarian cancer example. Methods: We used real and synthetic data for ovarian cancer diagnosis to train 59400 models with variations in estimation, model, and applicability uncertainty. We then used these models to estimate the probability of ovarian cancer in a fixed test set of 100 patients and evaluate the variability in individual estimates. Results: We show empirically that estimation uncertainty can be strongly dominated by model uncertainty and applicability uncertainty, even for models that perform well at the population level. Estimation uncertainty decreased considerably with increasing training sample size, whereas model and applicability uncertainty remained large. Conclusion: Individual risk estimates are far more uncertain than often assumed. Model uncertainty and applicability uncertainty usually remain invisible when prediction models or algorithms are based on a single study. Predictive algorithms should inform, not dictate, care and support personalization through clinician-patient interaction.
Submission history
From: Lasai Barreñada [view email][v1] Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:43:01 UTC (2,886 KB)
[v2] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 14:20:58 UTC (2,854 KB)
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
관련 뉴스
관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.
'research' 카테고리 뉴스
Correction: Oropouche infection in Peruvian patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PLOS ONE
Correction: Impact of different blood pressure targets on cerebral hemodynamics in septic shock: A prospective pilot study protocol—SEPSIS-BRAIN
PLOS ONE
Tumor hypoxia is associated with global copy-number alteration burden and subtype-dependent overall survival in breast cancer: Evidence from TCGA and METABRIC
PLOS ONE
arXiv의 다른 기사
Position Paper: Post-Solve Robustness in Decision Engines: Feasible Regions and Smoothness Under Perturbations
arXiv CS.AI
Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis
arXiv CS.AI
Deliberative Curation: A Protocol for Multi-Agent Knowledge Bases
arXiv CS.AI