CLOUDADV: Decision-Aligned Instance Sizing with Zero-Shot Foundation Models under Drift

Cloud virtual machines are often overprovisioned, creating avoidable cost and operational inefficiency.

We present CLOUDADV, an interactive engineer-facing advisory system for cloud instance sizing under workload drift.

The system combines zero-shot time-series forecasting with bounded recommendation generation across day-, week-, and month-scale planning horizons.

For each query, CLOUDADV constructs a structured decision context from historical utilization, forecast summaries, current VM metadata, candidate instance options, pricing, and explicit sizing heuristics.

A higher-capacity LLM is used offline to generate reference recommendations, while a smaller production model is evaluated on the same prompts to assess deployment-time alignment under latency and cost constraints.

Evaluation prioritizes downstream recommendation quality using simulated Azure cost savings and ex-post exceedance, with rolling-origin forecast accuracy reported as a secondary diagnostic against classical and supervised baselines.

In a case study of seven production VMs, the reference recommendations reduce simulated monthly cost from about \$1,503 to \$708, yielding \$795/month in savings (52.9%) under conservative heuristic constraints, while the highest observed exceedance rate among downgraded cases is 1.5%.

Although Chronos-2 does not minimize every forecasting metric, it often induces recommendation patterns similar to those of a supervised per-VM baseline.

These results suggest that zero-shot foundation models can support decision-aligned provisioning in non-stationary cloud environments while reducing the operational burden of repeated per-tenant retraining, revalidation, and redeployment.