On the choice of using raw or demographically-corrected scores

Demographic corrections are routinely performed in many disciplines, including psychology.

Yet, there are ongoing debates about whether these corrections are appropriate and improve classification accuracy.

Here, we focus on cognitive screening tests, and show that common demographic corrections, like the z-score standardization, can be detrimental for classification in some settings.

Formally, we present sufficient conditions ensuring that raw scores outperform the demographically-corrected ones, and give a substantive interpretation of this result.

We also investigate the claim that using demographically-corrected scores results in more fair decisions compared to using raw scores.

We apply our results to the Mini-Mental State Examination in the OASIS-3 dataset.