A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administration

Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems.

But these distinctions affect how different systems impact core public values like accountability, procedural justice, and non-discrimination.

This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI" and makes three contributions to this end.

First, we introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems.

We calibrate the typology to public administration by grouping system types by their distinct implications for public values.

Second, we evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers (2019-2025) using our typology.

We find widespread imprecision: most papers (55\%) leave the studied system underspecified, 31\% motivate their work with a different system than they study, and 41\% make more general conclusions than the studied system supports.

Finally, we give practical recommendations for future research.

We highlight common pitfalls to avoid, and suggest that researchers should, at a minimum, provide enough technical detail to locate the studied system in our typology.

To this end, we provide a practical guide -- a short set of diagnostic questions answerable from public information and without specialist technical knowledge.