Scott complexity of trees of finite rank via degrees of categoricity
이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?
한 번의 탭으로 반응을 남겨요 · 로그인 불필요
Abstract
In earlier work we constructed, for each computable ordinal $\alpha$, a computable tree of rank $\alpha+1$ whose strong degree of categoricity is $\mathbf{0}^{(2\alpha)}$ for finite $\alpha$ (and $\mathbf{0}^{(2\alpha+1)}$ for infinite $\alpha$), and showed these degrees are optimal.
Those results are lightface: they concern computable copies and Turing degrees of isomorphisms.
In this paper we determine the boldface content of the construction.
We isolate a simple transfer principle showing that a degree-of-categoricity lower bound which holds \emph{uniformly relative to every oracle} defeats $L_{\omega_1\omega}$-definability of automorphism orbits outright, and we verify that our construction has this uniformity.
Writing $\A_{m+1}$ for the isomorphism type of our rank-$(m+1)$ trees ($m\geq 1$ finite), we conclude that $\A_{m+1}$ has Scott rank exactly $2m+1$ in the sense of Montalbán, and that its Scott sentence complexity is one of $\Sin{2m+1}$, $\dSin{2m+1}$, or $\Pin{2m+2}$.
For rank $2$ we carry out a complete Scott analysis: the orbit of the level-one nodes of infinite degree is $\Pin{2}$- but not $\Sin{2}$-definable, and $\SSC(\A_2)=\Pin{4}$ exactly, witnessed by a computable $\Pc{4}$ Scott sentence.
We conjecture $\SSC(\A_{m+1})=\Pin{2m+2}$ for all finite $m$ and reduce the conjecture to a single back-and-forth substitution lemma.
These results begin a classification of the Scott sentence complexities of trees, in analogy with the Gonzalez--Rossegger analysis of linear orders, and connect the $2\alpha$-jump phenomenon in degrees of categoricity to Scott spectral gap questions of Harrison-Trainor and Kim.