research
중도 성향
A Theoretical Framework for Statistical Evaluability of Generative Models
arXiv Math
조회 0
CC BY
이 매체는 공공·자유 라이선스로 본문을 직접 표시합니다.Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 1 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]
Title:A Theoretical Framework for Statistical Evaluability of Generative Models
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Statistical evaluation aims to estimate the generalization performance of a model using held-out i.i.d. test data sampled from the ground-truth distribution. In supervised learning settings such as classification, performance metrics such as error rate are well-defined, and test error reliably approximates population error given sufficiently large datasets. In contrast, evaluation is more challenging for generative models due to their open-ended nature: it is unclear which metrics are appropriate and whether such metrics can be reliably evaluated from finite samples.
In this work, we introduce a theoretical framework for evaluating generative models and establish evaluability results for commonly used metrics. We study two categories of metrics: test-based metrics, including integral probability metrics (IPMs), and Rényi divergences. We show that IPMs with respect to any bounded test class can be evaluated from finite samples up to multiplicative and additive approximation errors. Moreover, when the test class has finite fat-shattering dimension, IPMs can be evaluated with arbitrary precision. In contrast, Rényi and KL divergences are not evaluable from finite samples, as their values can be critically determined by rare events. We also analyze the potential and limitations of perplexity as an evaluation method.
Submission history
From: Shashaank Aiyer [view email][v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 01:53:59 UTC (31 KB)
[v2] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:32:20 UTC (32 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
관련 뉴스
관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.
'research' 카테고리 뉴스
Position Paper: Post-Solve Robustness in Decision Engines: Feasible Regions and Smoothness Under Perturbations
arXiv CS.AI
Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis
arXiv CS.AI
Deliberative Curation: A Protocol for Multi-Agent Knowledge Bases
arXiv CS.AI