US holds fire against Iran as reports of concerns over of dwindling munitions emerge
ONP 요약
US launched airstrikes targeting Iran, hitting infrastructure including bridges near Yemen and areas near the US bases in Iraq and the Persian Gulf. There are conflicting reports on the intent behind these strikes; while Trump maintains readiness for talks with Iran, outlets like Reuters suggest these actions resemble a broader military campaign resembling a 'vendetta'.
진보 성향:Progressive outlets like Repubblica highlight the military escalation and contrast it with Trump's diplomatic overtures, framing it as potentially escalating tensions.
중도 성향:Moderate outlets such as Ada Derana and The Jakarta Post focus on the continuation of military action without explicitly aligning with Trump's diplomatic stance, emphasizing uncertainty around de-escalation.
보수 성향:Conservative outlets like Breitbart emphasize the depth and scope of military strikes against Iran's infrastructure, aligning closely with Trump's hardline approach.
Iran passed another night without US airstrikes between Saturday and Sunday, as Washington paused a war nearing its fifth month and reports emerged that concerns over dwindling munitions were restraining plans for further escalation.
The lull has revived hopes of a return to negotiations after nearly two weeks of consecutive nightly US bombardments, although US media reported the pause could also reflect pressure on stockpiles of Patriot interceptors and other defensive weapons.
Fighting over the strategic Strait of Hormuz derailed diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran, but the conflict then expanded beyond the vital energy corridor to include attacks on US bases, regional shipping and Gulf allies.
However, US operations against Iran were “on a hold”, CNN reported, quoting an unidentified Pentagon source, even as US President Donald Trump threatened a “much higher level” of strikes on Friday.
Plans to escalate the campaign have been shelved in part because of those shrinking supplies, The New York Times reported, citing two people briefed on the matter.
Trump also faces the risk of a wider Middle East war, the estrangement of vulnerable Gulf allies and further shocks to the global economy, the newspaper said.
Vice President JD Vance and top US general Dan Caine both raised concerns about escalation at a White House meeting on Friday, CNN reported.
Caine told Trump the military could carry out the options available to him successfully but warned of the possible implications, according to the network.
‘Much higher level’
Trump said on Friday he had not decided whether to return to an all-out operation.
“We’re talking to them right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious,” he told journalists.
Trump said Iran faced a choice between a deal and strikes at a “much higher level”.
The war that Trump once predicted would last four or five weeks is now nearing its fifth month, and is weighing on the Republican’s approval ratings ahead of crucial US midterm elections in November.
The Pentagon had presented Trump with a plan for a 14th night of strikes but he declined to authorise it in favour of a push for talks, Axios reported.
New front
Fighting has meanwhile spread to a new front.
Yemen’s Houthi rebels said they struck Saudi Aramco sites in Jizan and Yanbu on Saturday, a day after Riyadh bombed Houthi targets.
A surface-to-air battery operated by Greek personnel in Saudi Arabia downed two ballistic missiles and a drone over Yanbu, the Greek air force media office said.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had stopped four ships attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz in 24 hours.
Tehran’s effective blockade of the waterway remains the central flashpoint with Washington.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran could not be blamed for the escalation and offered to broker talks between the Houthis and Riyadh, saying “there is no military solution”. ...
이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?
탭 한 번으로 반응 · 로그인 불필요