오픈뉴스백과
세계의 오늘한국의 오늘피드
뉴스
전체 뉴스진영별 의제회사정부과학학술용어사전뉴스로 배우기
커뮤니티제보
...

오픈뉴스백과

집단지성 기반 뉴스 검증 플랫폼. 다양한 시각으로 뉴스를 이해합니다.

후원하기

서비스

세계의 오늘한국의 오늘뉴스정부과학학술용어사전소개

법적 고지

개인정보처리방침이용약관콘텐츠 이용 안내

문의

이메일 문의

본 플랫폼에서 제공하는 뉴스 콘텐츠의 저작권은 각 언론사에 있으며, 무단 복제 및 배포를 금지합니다.

RSS 피드를 통해 수집된 콘텐츠는 각 원저작자의 라이선스 조건을 따릅니다. 오픈 라이선스(CC-BY 등) 콘텐츠는 해당 라이선스에 따라 출처를 표기합니다.

오픈뉴스백과는 뉴스 집계 및 검증 플랫폼으로, 개별 기사의 내용에 대한 책임은 해당 언론사에 있습니다.

이용자가 작성한 피드백, 팩트체크, 독자 제보 등의 콘텐츠에 대한 책임은 해당 작성자에게 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제거 요청: contact@opennewspedia.com

© 2026 오픈뉴스백과 (OpenNewsPedia). All rights reserved.

뉴스 목록
미디어 커버리지1건1개 미디어
보수 성향 100%
The Economic Times (India)
경제
보수 성향

India trails China in productivity race

The Economic Times (India)
조회 0

New Delhi: India's labour productivity gap with China has widened by more than USD 30,000 per worker since 2000, despite decades of strong economic growth, with the country yet to achieve the industry-led productivity transformation seen in economies such as China, South Korea and Vietnam, according to an Equirus Securities research report.

The report, titled "Labour Productivity in Emerging Economies: Catch-up, Innovation, and now AI", said India's GDP per worker has more than tripled since 1995, but productivity gains have lagged behind some of its Asian peers.

"India's productivity gap with China has widened by over USD 30,000 per worker in absolute terms since 2000, despite decades of strong GDP growth.

India and Bangladesh today sit at near-identical productivity levels," the report said.

The report noted that while emerging market labour productivity has grown steadily over the past three decades, the current phase is marked by sharp divergence across countries.

It identified Vietnam as the standout performer in the post-pandemic period, driven by manufacturing-led foreign investment, while India continues to face structural constraints.

According to Equirus, India has "not yet executed the industry-led productivity leap that China, Korea, and Vietnam delivered in their high-growth phases." The report said India's labour productivity growth accelerated to 5.3 per cent annually in the 2000s on the back of the IT and services boom, but slowed to 3.4 per cent in the 2010s due to a series of economic disruptions.

It pointed out that India's productivity performance suffered from "the demonetisation shock (2016), GST implementation disruption (2017), and NBFC liquidity crises" that weighed on the informal economy.

The report also highlighted the severe impact of the pandemic on India's productivity.

"India's COVID shock (-12.3% in 2020) was the sharpest in this dataset - a direct consequence of informal sector dependence, migrant labour exposure, and strict lockdowns," it said.

While productivity growth has recovered in recent years, Equirus said the rebound remains uneven because India's most productive sectors account for a relatively small share of employment.

"The services-manufacturing divide means India's headline productivity is highly uneven.

If services are stripped out, productivity growth in goods-producing sectors has been far more modest," the report noted.

It said schemes such as the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) programme and the China+1 investment shift are supporting growth in sectors including electronics, pharmaceuticals and auto components.

However, these gains have not yet translated into a structural increase in manufacturing's contribution to the economy.

"The PLI scheme and China+1 FDI thesis are real tailwinds - electronics, pharma, and auto components are showing genuine output gains.

But manufacturing's share of GDP has not structurally risen," the report said.

Equirus identified labour market rigidities and high logistics costs as key barriers to stronger productivity growth, noting that logistics costs remain around 13-14 per cent of GDP compared with 8-9 per cent in China.

The report concluded that India's long-term fundamentals remain favourable due to its demographic profile, capital markets, foreign investment inflows and digital infrastructure.

However, it cautioned that sustaining higher productivity growth would require deeper structural reforms beyond capital expenditure and incentive schemes.

"The current administration's focus on capital expenditure and PLI is necessary but not sufficient - transportation costs, commodity pressures, land reforms; would be crucial to push the needle towards a high-productivity story akin to China," it said. ...

전문 보기

이 뉴스, 독자들은 어떻게 느꼈나요?

첫 반응을 남겨보세요

로그인하면 감정 반응에 참여할 수 있어요.

관련 뉴스

관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.

'economy' 카테고리 뉴스

“K팝, 음악 축제는 일본보다 뒤처진다?” 글로벌 축제 매력도 지수 보니[제철축제]

매일경제

손흥민 6위·이강인 15위…AI가 선택한 '월드컵 미남' 1위는?

머니투데이

이용규 '음주운전 은퇴' 여파…장영석, 1군 타격 코치 합류

머니투데이

The Economic Times의 다른 기사

Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam move fresh bail plea

The Economic Times (India)

India, Nepal discusses cross-border rail

The Economic Times (India)

BCCI refuses middleman role in IPL player row

The Economic Times (India)

피드백

피드백을 남기려면 로그인해 주세요.