The Negative Binomial Chain-Ladder: A Full Likelihood Model for Claim Count Reserving

Statistics > Methodology [Submitted on 15 May 2026 (v1), last revised 18 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:The Negative Binomial Chain-Ladder: A Full Likelihood Model for Claim Count Reserving View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:The Chain-Ladder (CL) method remains the dominant macro-level technique for claims reserving in non-life insurance, yet its classical formulation lacks a coherent probabilistic foundation. Existing stochastic extensions-including the Mack model and the Over-Dispersed Poisson (ODP) framework-provide measures of uncertainty but rely on second-moment assumptions or quasi-likelihood variance structures without clear generative interpretations. This paper develops a Negative Binomial Chain-Ladder (NB-CL) model that embeds the CL method within a full likelihood-based framework. The key contribution is a micro-level derivation showing that the negative binomial distribution arises naturally from a Poisson-Gamma construction: claims arrive according to a Poisson process with Gamma-distributed accident-year heterogeneity, and aggregation yields negative binomial incremental counts. This derivation gives the dispersion parameter $\kappa$ a structural interpretation as accident-year heterogeneity, rather than an ad-hoc overdispersion adjustment. The NB-CL model generalises the Poisson Chain-Ladder model in the limit $\kappa \to \infty$, shares the point estimates of the ODP model while differing in its variance function (quadratic vs. linear), and unifies the Chain-Ladder family within a single probabilistic hierarchy. A parametric bootstrap procedure is developed to incorporate both process and parameter uncertainty. Simulation studies confirm near-nominal coverage under correct specification once the dispersion parameter is bias-corrected, and a controlled degradation under model misspecification. Empirical illustrations on claim count data (Australian motor bodily injury) and paid amounts (Taylor-Ashe) document both the structural reading of $\kappa$ and the working-approximation status of the model in the amounts case. Submission history From: Robin Van Oirbeek [view email][v1] Fri, 15 May 2026 10:06:21 UTC (43 KB) [v2] Thu, 18 Jun 2026 07:54:12 UTC (44 KB) Current browse context: stat.ME References & Citations Loading... Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Recommenders and Search Tools Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.