오픈뉴스백과
오늘의 이슈오늘 10장그래프ONP 브리핑
뉴스개체 사전회사공식 자료라이브용어사전뉴스로 배우기홈피드 제보내 편향
...

오픈뉴스백과

집단지성 기반 뉴스 검증 플랫폼. 다양한 시각으로 뉴스를 이해합니다.

서비스

오늘의 이슈홈라이브뉴스공식 자료용어사전소개

법적 고지

개인정보처리방침이용약관콘텐츠 이용 안내

문의

문의하기

본 플랫폼에서 제공하는 뉴스 콘텐츠의 저작권은 각 언론사에 있으며, 무단 복제 및 배포를 금지합니다.

RSS 피드를 통해 수집된 콘텐츠는 각 원저작자의 라이선스 조건을 따릅니다. 오픈 라이선스(CC-BY 등) 콘텐츠는 해당 라이선스에 따라 출처를 표기합니다.

오픈뉴스백과는 뉴스 집계 및 검증 플랫폼으로, 개별 기사의 내용에 대한 책임은 해당 언론사에 있습니다.

이용자가 작성한 피드백, 팩트체크, 독자 제보 등의 콘텐츠에 대한 책임은 해당 작성자에게 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제거·정정이 필요하시면 문의하기에 남겨 주세요.

© 2026 오픈뉴스백과 (OpenNewsPedia). All rights reserved.

오늘의 이슈
미디어 커버리지1건1개 미디어
The New Republic
정치
진보 성향

Did Trump Officials Rig High School Contest Against Sikh Finalist?

The New Republic
Did Trump Officials Rig High School Contest Against Sikh Finalist?

The Presidential 1776 Award competition was set up by the Trump administration to honor the U.S.’s 250th birthday with a civics contest for high school students. 

But the family of Aangad Singh, 15, believes he may have been kept out of the competition’s final because of his Sikh background and visible turban, NOTUS reports. 

Singh, a rising high school junior who lives in Connecticut, entered the competition in February just like other high school students around the country. He scored well enough to reach the finals in Washington, D.C., at the end of June and make the final eight. But his elimination after that left his family—and many of his competitors—puzzled.

The Singh family didn’t think Aangad had done poorly, but there wasn’t a live scoreboard. Other contestants told them after the competition that they were sure Aangad had won and were shocked that he wasn’t in the top three. When Aangad’s mother, Ramandeep, asked an official with the Department of Education, which helped run the contest, for the final scores, the official told her that was proprietary information. 

So, the Singh family waited until the competition was televised on CBS three weeks later, and Aangad was shocked to learn some of his correct answers were labeled wrong. 

In one instance, Aangad was asked to give four examples where federal courts have jurisdiction as outlined in Article 3 of the Constitution. 

Two of his answers—“Parties of state and citizens of another state,” and “Case with state and foreign nation”—were marked wrong. He showed his father a copy of the Constitution showing that his answers were right. 

In another instance, during a lightning round, Aangad was asked “Which amendment ended slavery?” and his answer was marked wrong. Initially, he thought his pronunciation of “Thirteenth” was bad and that his th- sounded like an f. But he was reassured when the TV subtitles proved that he said the correct answer. 

After the round ended, each contestant was interviewed by host Mario Lopez before he announced the three finalists, and Aangad gave an answer about being proud to share his knowledge about the country’s founding principles. Then, he watched white contestants from Michigan, Washington, and Wyoming be announced as the winners. 

Singh’s family thought that he was robbed, and weighed taking action. To his mother and uncle, it seemed like Aangad was being kept out of the spotlight—and a visit to the Oval Office to meet President Trump—because he was a brown kid with a turban. They didn’t care as much about getting a share of the $250,000 in scholarship money as much as Aangad being recognized for his hard work. 

The Wyoming winner was a homeschooled girl who would later be touted by the Department of Education for culture war propaganda, and the Washington state winner told Trump at the White House she wanted to attend Hillsdale College, a politically conservative school, to which Trump said he could give a recommendation. 

Aangad’s father, Bhalindar, reached out to the Department of Education twice by email, but has yet to get a response. The Education Department told NOTUS that the questions in the competition were “developed, judged, and scored independently by the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation.” NOTUS sent the foundation a detailed list of questions, but also hasn’t heard back. 

Minutes before NOTUS’s deadline, the Department of Education responded, saying that the  competition’s rules stated that judges would “exercise independent good faith judgement” in selecting finalists and winners, and that, by participating, contestants “agree that the decision of the judges is final and binding.” ...

전문 보기

이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?

탭 한 번으로 반응 · 로그인 불필요

관련 뉴스

관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.

'politics' 카테고리 뉴스

與, 중수청에 경찰 증거인멸 사건 보완수사 맡긴다

노컷뉴스

윤석열·오세훈 유죄…'명태균 게이트' 법원 판단 공통점

노컷뉴스

부동산 국민 제안 5천건 쏟아졌다…대출·공급·세제 '갑론을박'

노컷뉴스

The New Republic의 다른 기사

Modeling Scout Named Thousands of Times in Epstein Files Found Dead

The New Republic

Trump’s Nuclear Deal With Saudi Arabia Looks More Like a Favor

The New Republic

Senators, Here’s How Todd Blanche Gave You Reasons to Vote Against Him

The New Republic

피드백

피드백을 남기려면 로그인해 주세요.