오픈뉴스백과
세계의 오늘한국의 오늘피드
뉴스
전체 뉴스진영별 의제회사정부과학학술용어사전뉴스로 배우기
커뮤니티제보
...

오픈뉴스백과

집단지성 기반 뉴스 검증 플랫폼. 다양한 시각으로 뉴스를 이해합니다.

서비스

세계의 오늘한국의 오늘뉴스정부과학학술용어사전소개

법적 고지

개인정보처리방침이용약관콘텐츠 이용 안내

문의

이메일 문의

본 플랫폼에서 제공하는 뉴스 콘텐츠의 저작권은 각 언론사에 있으며, 무단 복제 및 배포를 금지합니다.

RSS 피드를 통해 수집된 콘텐츠는 각 원저작자의 라이선스 조건을 따릅니다. 오픈 라이선스(CC-BY 등) 콘텐츠는 해당 라이선스에 따라 출처를 표기합니다.

오픈뉴스백과는 뉴스 집계 및 검증 플랫폼으로, 개별 기사의 내용에 대한 책임은 해당 언론사에 있습니다.

이용자가 작성한 피드백, 팩트체크, 독자 제보 등의 콘텐츠에 대한 책임은 해당 작성자에게 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제거 요청: contact@opennewspedia.com

© 2026 오픈뉴스백과 (OpenNewsPedia). All rights reserved.

뉴스 목록
미디어 커버리지1건1개 미디어
arXiv CS.AI
학술
기타

Dr-DCI: Scaling Direct Corpus Interaction via Dynamic Workspace Expansion

arXiv CS.AI
조회 0
CC BY
이 매체는 공공·자유 라이선스로 본문을 직접 표시합니다.
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026] Title:Dr-DCI: Scaling Direct Corpus Interaction via Dynamic Workspace Expansion View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Agentic search over large corpora relies on retriever-mediated interfaces (e.g., BM25 or ColBERT) for scalable candidate discovery. While effective at ranking relevant documents, these interfaces expose evidence only as ranked results or bounded document views, limiting agents' ability to reorganize material and verify constraints across documents. Direct Corpus Interaction (DCI) addresses this limitation by exposing shell-executable corpus operations for flexible search, filtering, comparison, and verification. However, full-corpus terminal commands become slow and unstable as the corpus grows, degrading performance and efficiency. We introduce DR-DCI, a retriever-steered DCI framework that treats retrieval as an agent-callable action for expanding a local workspace. Rather than operating directly over the full corpus, the agent dynamically pulls relevant documents into an evolving workspace and conducts DCI operations within it. This design combines retriever-level recall with DCI-style precision: retrieval keeps exploration scalable, while DCI preserves the local operations needed for effective evidence resolution. Experiments show that DR-DCI is both effective and efficient across scales. On Browsecomp-Plus, DR-DCI reaches 71.2\% accuracy, improving over raw DCI and ablated variants by up to 8.3 points while reducing tool usage, wall time, and estimated cost. With workspace-preserving context reset, accuracy further improves to 73.3\%. In corpus-scaling experiments, DR-DCI remains effective from 100K to 10M documents, whereas raw DCI becomes unstable and BM25 performs substantially worse. DR-DCI also scales to a 20M-scale file-per-document Wiki-18 QA setting, achieving an average score of 63.0 across six benchmarks and outperforming retrieval-based and trained search-agent baselines. Ablation analysis further shows that ranked previews and inter-document DCI are key to performance. References & Citations Loading... Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Recommenders and Search Tools Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
전문 보기

이 뉴스, 독자들은 어떻게 느꼈나요?

첫 반응을 남겨보세요

로그인하면 감정 반응에 참여할 수 있어요.

관련 뉴스

관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.

'research' 카테고리 뉴스

A Definition of Good Explanations and the Challenges Explaining LLM Outputs

arXiv CS.AI

Relational Structural Causal Models

arXiv CS.AI

Trust Between AI Agents: Measuring Formation, Breakage, and Recovery, with Implications for Governing Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv CS.AI

arXiv의 다른 기사

AI Engram: In Search of Memory Traces in Artificial Intelligence

arXiv CS.AI

Metric Match: A Subset Selection Approach to Evaluating LLM Judge Reliability

arXiv CS.AI

OSGuard: A Benchmark for Safety in Computer-Use Agents

arXiv CS.AI

피드백

피드백을 남기려면 로그인해 주세요.