Line-Anchored Feedback Cuts Token Costs and Improves Correctness in AI Code Editing

Generated tokens are a direct driver of the cost, latency, and energy of generative AI (GAI) code editing.

We show the format of feedback is a lever on all three.

We compare two deliveries of the same requested changes: a holistic prompt (control) versus the structured, line-anchored export of FileMark (treatment).

FileMark is a VSCodium extension for inline comments on any file.

In a paired experiment line anchoring cut generated tokens by 22% (Claude Opus) and 58% (Claude Sonnet), reaching 24%-80% on files of 100 lines or more, with four of seven models generating significantly fewer tokens after multiple-testing correction.

Correctness rose where models had headroom: +2.0 points pooled and +5 to +7 points for three of five local models.

An exploratory experiment in which the harness, not the GAI model, applies function-level patches shows the correctness benefit grows further when the edit-application burden is lifted: local-model correctness on 100+ line files roughly triples under anchoring.

Line-anchored feedback reduces what stronger models spend and improves what weaker models get right.