The Geometry of Updates: Fisher Alignment at Vocabulary Scale

Training-free source selection for LLM families with shared vocabularies arises in scientific string domains such as SMILES, protein, and genomic sequences, where candidate corpora share a tokenizer but differ in prediction targets.

This creates an activation-dark regime: representation-similarity metrics can be uninformative without assumptions about label-conditioned error geometry, while classical update-geometry metrics are computationally prohibitive at vocabulary scale.

We show that, in a shared-output head setting, representation metrics (e.g., CKA) are non-identifiable for transfer; models can share identical representations yet have orthogonal head updates.

The key identity is that head Fisher alignment is exactly a cosine between kernel mean embeddings in the joint activation-error space, exposing activation, error, and coupling factors rather than requiring a materialized Fisher matrix.

FisherSketch estimates this cosine directly in a single streaming pass, making K=128,256 head Fisher alignment practical with a 16 KB task signature (m=4096) and a 192 KB per-task streaming state, small enough to store next to a model hash, but encoding transfer-relevant update structure.

Beyond source selection, the same signatures and marginals provide a diagnostic instrument for studying whether LLM task similarity is driven by activations, errors, or their coupling; shared-parameter and internal-layer validations, together with Llama-3.1-8B verbalizer-shift experiments, show that FisherSketch remains informative when activation similarity cannot distinguish tasks.