Win by Silence: Deletion Non-Monotonicity, Autonomous Exploitation, and Typed-State Gating in LLM Plan Evaluation

Plan evaluators can reward a strategic plan for becoming less explicit.

This paper studies that failure in a staged expected-value scorer for LLM-generated venture routes.

Proposition 1 gives the score change from deleting an interior transition while retargeting its predecessor and retaining downstream value: Delta_k = (prod_{i<k} p_i)[c_k + (1 - p_k)R_{k+1}].

On a frozen 26-route cohort, all 57 admissible deletions matched the analytic identity and threshold sign, and every route had at least one score-improving deletion.

A score-seeking optimizer, allowed to restructure routes but not told the exploit mechanism, found baseline-beating uncovered structures in 21/26 routes.

GATE refused score release for 26/26 silenced routes with 0/26 honest suspensions; after refusal, 47/54 next revisions repaired to a covered structure, and strict covered improvement rose from 1/26 to 13/26.

An adaptive compiler-aware co-author exposed the registry-provenance boundary: obligation-channel evasions remained 6/6 across all four v1/v1.5 conditions, while delta-indexed cost floors reduced beat-honest routes from 6/6 to 3/6 and fundability-by-silence from 5/6 to 0/6 without establishing semantic completeness.

If a plan scores better only because it omits necessary work, the plan did not improve; the evaluation created an omission incentive.

PCSC detects and neutralizes post-hoc omission splices over model-mediated typed-state records.

In the cooperative setting tested, GATE acts as a deterministic search-shaping constraint, not merely a post-hoc filter.

It does not verify the semantic completeness or real-world quality of arbitrary LLM-generated strategies.