오픈뉴스백과
세계의 오늘둘러보기뉴스로 배우기커뮤니티뉴스
ONP 브리핑한국의 오늘회사학술과학정부용어사전피드 제보내 편향
...

오픈뉴스백과

집단지성 기반 뉴스 검증 플랫폼. 다양한 시각으로 뉴스를 이해합니다.

서비스

세계의 오늘한국의 오늘라이브뉴스정부과학학술용어사전소개

법적 고지

개인정보처리방침이용약관콘텐츠 이용 안내

문의

문의하기

본 플랫폼에서 제공하는 뉴스 콘텐츠의 저작권은 각 언론사에 있으며, 무단 복제 및 배포를 금지합니다.

RSS 피드를 통해 수집된 콘텐츠는 각 원저작자의 라이선스 조건을 따릅니다. 오픈 라이선스(CC-BY 등) 콘텐츠는 해당 라이선스에 따라 출처를 표기합니다.

오픈뉴스백과는 뉴스 집계 및 검증 플랫폼으로, 개별 기사의 내용에 대한 책임은 해당 언론사에 있습니다.

이용자가 작성한 피드백, 팩트체크, 독자 제보 등의 콘텐츠에 대한 책임은 해당 작성자에게 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제거·정정이 필요하시면 문의하기에 남겨 주세요.

© 2026 오픈뉴스백과 (OpenNewsPedia). All rights reserved.

뉴스 목록
미디어 커버리지1건1개 미디어
진보 성향 100%
Dawn (Pakistan)
세계
진보 성향

Women’s inheritance rights enshrined in Sharia, Supreme Court holds

Dawn (Pakistan)
조회 0
Women’s inheritance rights enshrined in Sharia, Supreme Court holds

이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?

한 번의 탭으로 반응을 남겨요 · 로그인 불필요

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday settled a 71-year-old family dispute, ruling that inheritance is a vested Sharia (Islamic) and legal right that devolves upon all heirs, including women, immediately upon the death of the family head.

The court held that this right cannot be defeated through private arrangements, social pressure, dubious revenue entries or procedural manoeuvres.

“The right of inheritance is not a bounty to be bestowed at the pleasure of male family members, nor a concession dependent upon custom, convenience or familial goodwill,” Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan obser­ved while setting aside the Jan 26, 2017 judgement of the Lahore High Court’s Bahawalpur bench.

The dispute arose after Roshan, the owner of the suit property, died in 1955. Inheritance Mutation No. 74 was entered on April 4, 1955 in favour of his legal heirs. On the same day, Mutation No. 75 was recorded on the basis of an alleged verbal gift purportedly made by the widow and daughters in favour of the deceased’s two sons.

Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan notes law favours protecting interest of female heirs

The petitioners maintained that no such gift had ever been made and that Mutation No. 75 was fraudulently sanctioned to deprive the female heirs of their lawful shares. After retaining possession of the property, the sons and their successors transferred it through exchange mutations and gift deeds in favour of their descendants.

The petitioners filed a suit seeking a declaration that Mutation No. 75 was illegal. The trial court dismissed the suit, while the appellate court and the LHC also upheld the decision.

Allowing the appeal, the SC declared Mutation No. 75 illegal, void and ineffective against the petitioners’ inheritance rights. It held that they were entitled to their respective shares in Roshan’s estate under the applicable law of inheritance.

The SC also directed the revenue authorities to correct the revenue record and complete the determination and separation of the heirs’ shares in accordance with the law.

Heading a two-judge bench, Justice Hassan observed that courts and revenue authorities dealing with inheritance disputes must remain mindful that the law favours protecting, rather than defeating, the inheritance rights of women. Any transaction excluding a female heir from succession, he said, must be subjected to the utmost care and judicial scrutiny.

The judgement held that once the validity of an alleged gift is challenged, the burden shifts to the beneficiaries to prove that the transaction was lawful.

The SC reiterated that the law of inheritance occupies a unique position in Islamic jurisprudence bec­au­se it embodies the divine scheme for the distribution of wealth and seeks to en­­s­u­­re economic justice within families and society.

The judgement noted that women continue to be deprived of their lawful inheritance through fabricated gifts, manipulated revenue entries, fraudulent relinquishments, coercive family arrangements and prolonged litigation designed to wear down those asserting their rights.

Justice Hassan observed that the persistence of such disputes reflec­ted not only a legal problem but also a societal one. The denial of in­­he­r­i­tance rights, he said, often beg­ins wi­­thin homes and communities, where women are expected to surrender rights guaranteed by relig­ion and law in the name of tradition, family honour or social convenience.

The judgement stressed that responsibility for protecting inheritance rights does not rest solely with the state. Families, community leaders, religious scholars, legal practitioners, revenue officials and civil society all share a collective duty to ensure that rights granted by Almighty Allah are neither diluted nor denied.

“A society that celebrates the virtues of justice while tolerating the deprivation of women from their lawful inheritance suffers from a contradiction that cannot be re­­­conciled with either constitutional values or Islamic principles,” Justice Hassan observed, adding that the true measure of a legal system lies in the rights it protects.

Published in Dawn, July 2nd, 2026 ...

전문 보기

관련 뉴스

관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.

'world' 카테고리 뉴스

W. Visayas rice farmers urged to prepare for 5 major pests, diseases

Philippine Daily Inquirer

Rizal town residents urged to stop dumping garbage in waterways

Philippine Daily Inquirer

Romualdez pushes for stronger school safety measures

Philippine Daily Inquirer

Dawn의 다른 기사

Mediators say 'positive progress' made in US-Iran talks in Doha

Dawn (Pakistan)

Pindi police to seek trial of heinous cases on jail premises

Dawn (Pakistan)

Sindh CM Murad announces 20,000 Google Career Certificate scholarships for students

Dawn (Pakistan)

피드백

피드백을 남기려면 로그인해 주세요.