research
중도 성향
Do Joint Audio-Video Generation Models Understand Physics?
arXiv CS.AI
조회 0
CC BY
이 매체는 공공·자유 라이선스로 본문을 직접 표시합니다.Computer Science > Sound
[Submitted on 8 May 2026 (v1), last revised 29 May 2026 (this version, v2)]
Title:Do Joint Audio-Video Generation Models Understand Physics?
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Joint audio-video generation models are rapidly approaching professional production quality, raising a central question: do they understand audio-visual physics, or merely generate plausible sounds and frames that violate real-world consistency? We introduce AV-Phys Bench, a benchmark for evaluating physical commonsense in joint audio-video generation. AV-Phys Bench tests models across three scene categories: Steady State, Event Transition, and Environment Transition. It covers physics-grounded subcategories drawn from real-world scenes, plus Anti-AV-Physics prompts that deliberately request physically inconsistent audio-video behavior. Each generation is evaluated along five dimensions: visual semantic adherence, audio semantic adherence, visual physical commonsense, audio physical commonsense, and cross-modal physical commonsense. Across three proprietary and four open-source models, we find that Seedance 2.0 performs best overall, but all models remain far from robust physical understanding. Performance drops sharply on event-driven and environment-driven transitions, and even strong proprietary systems collapse on Anti-AV-Physics prompts. We further introduce AV-Phys Agent, a ReAct-style evaluator that combines a multimodal language model with deterministic acoustic measurement tools, producing rankings that closely align with human ratings. Our results identify cross-modal physical consistency and transition-driven scene dynamics as key open challenges for joint audio-video generation.
Submission history
From: Xiulong Liu [view email][v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 00:14:07 UTC (7,644 KB)
[v2] Fri, 29 May 2026 22:08:19 UTC (7,647 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.SD
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
관련 뉴스
관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.
'research' 카테고리 뉴스
Correction: Oropouche infection in Peruvian patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PLOS ONE
Correction: Impact of different blood pressure targets on cerebral hemodynamics in septic shock: A prospective pilot study protocol—SEPSIS-BRAIN
PLOS ONE
Tumor hypoxia is associated with global copy-number alteration burden and subtype-dependent overall survival in breast cancer: Evidence from TCGA and METABRIC
PLOS ONE
arXiv의 다른 기사
Position Paper: Post-Solve Robustness in Decision Engines: Feasible Regions and Smoothness Under Perturbations
arXiv CS.AI
Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis
arXiv CS.AI
Deliberative Curation: A Protocol for Multi-Agent Knowledge Bases
arXiv CS.AI