Iran war 'has been a strategic disaster for the State of Israel', analyst says
AI Summary
Israeli military strikes on Beirut on Sunday prompted US President Trump to publicly rebuke the action, warning it threatened to derail a pending US-Iran peace agreement that was expected to be finalized. Trump called for both Israel and Hezbollah to cease hostilities, arguing that continued attacks risked undermining the diplomatic breakthrough. Although the strikes delayed the signing by several hours, Trump maintained that the agreement remained on schedule for completion.
Progressive: Progressive-leaning outlets emphasized Trump's direct blame of Israel, framing the military strikes as the primary threat to the emerging peace deal and highlighting the administration's frustration with Israeli action jeopardizing the diplomatic breakthrough.
Moderate: Centrist outlets reported Trump's criticism of the Israeli strikes while prominently featuring his reassurances that the deal remained viable and on track, and stressed his calls for restraint from both Israel and Hezbollah to preserve the nascent agreement.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is on a collision course with Donald Trump as the U.S. president seeks to extricate himself from the war, with both men's goals unmet and Israeli military operations tied down in Lebanon.
Speaking with FRANCE 24's Sharon Gaffney, Aaron David Miller, Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, says that "this has been a strategic disaster for the state of Israel.
All of Benjamin Netanyahu's war aims - diminished support for proxies, restrictions on ballistic missiles, overthrow of the regime, or weakening of the regime - none of this has occurred." ...
이 뉴스, 독자들은 어떻게 느꼈나요?
첫 반응을 남겨보세요로그인하면 감정 반응에 참여할 수 있어요.