A dynamic mechanism for prevalence of triangles in competitive networks

Triangles are abundant in real-world networks but rare in standard null models for sparse graphs.

Existing explanations typically rely on explicit triadic closure mechanisms or geometry-based connection rules.

We propose an alternative hypothesis: the frequent appearance of triangles may arise naturally from the requirement of dynamic stability that maintains coexistence of species in Lotka-Volterra systems with equal competitive interactions.

To evaluate this idea, we prove that, across all possible interaction graphs, coexistence is guaranteed whenever the coupling strength is below the reciprocal of the graph's maximum degree, and guaranteed not to occur when the coupling strength exceeds 1.

This leaves a large gap that is unexplained by the graph degrees alone.

We notice that the lower and upper bounds are achieved for star and complete graphs respectively and to investigate further what structural properties of the interaction graph control the critical coupling within the gap, we optimise networks algorithmically while keeping the degree sequence fixed.

We find that networks supporting stronger interaction strengths consistently exhibit higher clustering coefficients in several network models.

Moreover, in real-world grassland plant networks, we observe higher clustering and stronger stability than those expected from a configuration model with the same degree sequence.

Our result suggests that triangles, and clustering in general, may emerge as a structural signature of stabilising competition.