Trump faces fresh bipartisan criticism on Iran deal as Vance hails peace talks
AI Summary
The Trump administration has concluded a war with Iran through a negotiated agreement, but the deal faces widespread skepticism at home and abroad. Americans predominantly oppose both the conflict and resulting agreement, with 65% disapproval in recent polling. The administration presented the deal as necessary to prevent economic harm, yet analysts question whether it addresses Iran's core regional threats and nuclear capabilities, and observers worry the agreement leaves Iran strategically stronger than before the conflict.
이 이슈, 어느 시각에 더 공감하세요?
공감하는 시각을 고르면 독자 분위기가 보여요 · 로그인 불필요
Objections comes as Trump threatens to renew attacks on Iran if it doesn’t rein in its proxy in Lebanon
US political figures from left and right voiced fresh objections on Sunday to Donald Trump’s provisional deal with Iran – even as the US president made fresh threats while Vice-President JD Vance hailed progress during the first round of direct peace talks in Switzerland.
Senator John Cornyn, a Texas Republican who recently lost his primary battle for re-election, posted a line on X from a Wall Street Journal article on how rogue regimes evade US economic warfare. It said: “Iran’s ability to withstand sanctions so far exposes a hard fact for Washington: economic pressure has largely failed to cow rogue regimes, as they game out more ways to sidestep US restrictions.”
Continue reading...
이 뉴스, 독자들은 어떻게 느꼈나요?
첫 반응을 남겨보세요로그인하면 감정 반응에 참여할 수 있어요.