오픈뉴스백과
오늘의 이슈오늘 10장그래프ONP 브리핑
뉴스개체 사전공식 자료용어사전
...

오픈뉴스백과

집단지성 기반 뉴스 검증 플랫폼. 다양한 시각으로 뉴스를 이해합니다.

서비스

오늘의 이슈홈라이브뉴스공식 자료용어사전개체 사전내 편향피드 제보소개

법적 고지

개인정보처리방침이용약관콘텐츠 이용 안내

문의

문의하기

본 플랫폼에서 제공하는 뉴스 콘텐츠의 저작권은 각 언론사에 있으며, 무단 복제 및 배포를 금지합니다.

RSS 피드를 통해 수집된 콘텐츠는 각 원저작자의 라이선스 조건을 따릅니다. 오픈 라이선스(CC-BY 등) 콘텐츠는 해당 라이선스에 따라 출처를 표기합니다.

오픈뉴스백과는 뉴스 집계 및 검증 플랫폼으로, 개별 기사의 내용에 대한 책임은 해당 언론사에 있습니다.

이용자가 작성한 피드백, 팩트체크, 독자 제보 등의 콘텐츠에 대한 책임은 해당 작성자에게 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제거·정정이 필요하시면 문의하기에 남겨 주세요.

© 2026 오픈뉴스백과 (OpenNewsPedia). All rights reserved.

오늘의 이슈
미디어 커버리지1건1개 미디어
Axios
정치
중도 성향

AI is only "part" of high U.S. productivity growth, says Stripe economist

Axios
AI is only "part" of high U.S. productivity growth, says Stripe economist

AI appears to improve workers' efficiency in a number of sectors. The U.S. has experienced a surge in economy-wide productivity in the last couple of years. But the former isn't necessarily driving the latter.

The big picture: Companies are achieving more output per person-hour of labor because they are making better use of existing capital, a provocative new analysis finds — not, at the moment at least, by making major use of AI.

AI advances may be generating substantial micro-level gains in some sectors, but so far are not the driver of one of the most important macro trends of the last couple of years, finds Ernie Tedeschi, chief economist at Stripe.

State of play: A surge in labor productivity — after a couple of decades of subpar improvement — has been one of the best pieces of news about the U.S. economy in the last few years.

Over the last year, output per hour worked is up 2.5%, compared with 1.6% annually over the last 20 years, Tedeschi wrote.

That may sound like a small gap, but if sustained over just a few years, that higher productivity would compound, making incomes and output per worker much higher.

Yes, but: Tedeschi noted that while labor productivity is up, total factor productivity — not just output per hour of work but output per hour of work and unit of capital — is little changed.

Looking across industries, he finds that while sectors with high AI adoption do have higher productivity growth, that trend predates the pandemic — before high-quality large language models were widely used.

Rather, he finds, the higher output is coming from higher usage of existing capital.

Zoom in: "Think longer runs of factories already built, more utilization of server racks and GPU clusters already paid for, and more occupancy of existing hotel rooms," Tedeschi wrote.

"Economists call this 'capital intensity' or 'utilization.' Higher capital utilization represents real economic gains, but it's not the same as microproductivity."

Of note: None of that precludes the possibility that AI advances will generate major productivity gains in the not-too-distant future, as companies work through the workflow and choke points that have restrained their potential.

The bottom line: "It looks likelier and likelier that the U.S. is in a period of high productivity growth, and that AI is part of the story," Tedeschi tells Axios.

"But we need to be sober about how it's playing a role, because that will help us discern whether AI is just a temporary blip on the growth path or something more persistent and transformational." ...

전문 보기

이 뉴스, 어떠셨어요?

탭 한 번으로 반응 · 로그인 불필요

관련 뉴스

관련 뉴스 제보는 로그인 후 가능합니다.

'politics' 카테고리 뉴스

AIT hails joint coast guard operations

Taipei Times

Japan 7.1 quake: Many feared trapped in mall

Taipei Times

Taiwan suspends LNG from PNG over office closure

Taipei Times

Axios의 다른 기사

"It's a serious clusterf*ck": Behind-the-scenes fury and panic roil key House primary

Axios

Trump, Netanyahu tout "productive" meeting after weeks of tensions

Axios

Scoop: Nvidia's Jensen Huang meets Lutnick amid China scrutiny

Axios

피드백

피드백을 남기려면 로그인해 주세요.