InferenceBench: A Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Inference Optimization by AI Agents

AI agents are increasingly used to automate research and development tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them on prescribed workflows or narrow action spaces.

Even nominally open-ended tasks can often be solved by retrieving a well-known recipe and tuning a few hyperparameters, making it unclear whether strong results reflect genuine optimization or memorized solutions.

We introduce InferenceBench, where an agent must deploy an OpenAI-compatible inference server and optimize the speed of LLM inference.

Each agent receives a target LLM, one H100 GPU, an optimization scenario, and a wall-clock time budget of two hours.

Three optimization scenarios isolate distinct bottlenecks of inference (prefill latency, decode latency, and concurrent request throughput) and a fourth balances all three at the same time.

Across 15 frontier agent configurations, agents reliably improve over a naive PyTorch baseline (up to $8.08\times$) and often match or exceed serving engines with default settings ($4.05\times$ for vLLM), but still fall below a simple hyperparameter search under the same time budget (up to $11.53\times$).

Qualitative analysis of agent trajectories shows that although agents enumerate many relevant optimization techniques, they overwhelmingly converge on a single inference framework.

They test only a few distinct configurations and spend the remaining budget re-measuring, repairing, or optimizing hyperparameters rather than exploring substantially different strategies.

This suggests the bottleneck is not domain knowledge, but the ability to propose diverse configurations, evaluate them systematically, and submit the best identified solution.

Overall, InferenceBench reflects the ability of agents to operate in an open-ended AI engineering setting, where memorized solutions lead to limited improvements.