์˜คํ”ˆ๋‰ด์Šค๋ฐฑ๊ณผ

๋‰ด์Šค

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ ํŒŒํ‚ค์Šคํƒ„ ยท "FORGOTTEN" ยท ์ด 8๊ฑด

ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๋‰ด์Šค ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ์ง€์ˆ˜
์•ฝํ•œ ๋ถ€์ •
46
์ƒ์„ธ โ–พ

ํ˜„์žฌ ์ง€์ˆ˜

46.0

0 = ๋ถ€์ • ์šฐ์„ธ

50 = ์ค‘๋ฆฝ

100 = ๊ธ์ • ์šฐ์„ธ

๊ทน๋‹จ ๋ถ€์ •๋ถ€์ •์ค‘๋ฆฝ๊ธ์ •๊ทน๋‹จ ๊ธ์ •

์ตœ๊ทผ 7์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค€ 951๊ฑด์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‰ด์Šค ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” 46.0(์•ฝํ•œ ๋ถ€์ •)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธ์ • 168๊ฑด(17.7%)ยท์ค‘๋ฆฝ 498๊ฑด(52.4%)ยท๋ถ€์ • 285๊ฑด(30.0%)์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ฑํ–ฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ข…ํ•ฉ 40.3(๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธ์ • 168
์ค‘๋ฆฝ 498
๋ถ€์ • 285
๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ
๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ์„ฑํ–ฅ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ ยท 40.3
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ค‘๋„ ์„ฑํ–ฅ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์„ฑํ–ฅ
L 284 ยท C 0 ยท R 667
๋…์ž ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์„ฑํ–ฅํ‘œ๋ณธ ๋ถ€์กฑ ยท 0.0
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ค‘๋„ ์„ฑํ–ฅ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์„ฑํ–ฅ
ํ‘œ๋ณธ 0๊ฑด (L 0 ยท C 0 ยท R 0)
์ข…ํ•ฉ ์„ฑํ–ฅ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ ยท 40.3
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ค‘๋„ ์„ฑํ–ฅ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์„ฑํ–ฅ

ํƒ€์ž„๋ผ์ธ ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

์ตœ๊ทผ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„
14:009๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
50%
์Šคํฌ์ธ 
38%
์‚ฌํšŒ
13%
13:008๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
63%
์ •์น˜
25%
์‚ฌํšŒ
13%
12:009๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
63%
์ •์น˜
25%
์‚ฌํšŒ
13%
11:004๊ฑด
์‚ฌํšŒ
33%
์ •์น˜
33%
์Šคํฌ์ธ 
33%
10:0010๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
78%
์‚ฌํšŒ
11%
๋ฌธํ™”/์—ฐ์˜ˆ
11%
09:008๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
50%
์‚ฌํšŒ
33%
๊ฒฝ์ œ
17%
07:007๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
43%
์ •์น˜
43%
์Šคํฌ์ธ 
14%
06:006๊ฑด
์ •์น˜
50%
๊ธฐํƒ€
50%
05:0011๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
40%
์ •์น˜
40%
๋ฌธํ™”/์—ฐ์˜ˆ
20%
04:0012๊ฑด
์ •์น˜
50%
๊ธฐํƒ€
40%
์Šคํฌ์ธ 
10%
01:004๊ฑด
์‚ฌํšŒ
33%
์ •์น˜
33%
๊ฒฝ์ œ
33%
22:003๊ฑด
์‚ฌํšŒ
67%
์Šคํฌ์ธ 
33%
21:004๊ฑด
์ •์น˜
50%
๊ตญ๋ฐฉ
25%
๊ธฐํƒ€
25%
20:004๊ฑด
๋ฌธํ™”/์—ฐ์˜ˆ
50%
์ •์น˜
25%
๊ธฐํƒ€
25%
19:002๊ฑด
IT/๊ธฐ์ˆ 
50%
์ •์น˜
50%
18:0010๊ฑด
์ •์น˜
44%
์‚ฌํšŒ
33%
๊ธฐํƒ€
22%
17:005๊ฑด
์ •์น˜
60%
์‚ฌํšŒ
20%
๊ธฐํƒ€
20%
16:008๊ฑด
๊ธฐํƒ€
50%
์‚ฌํšŒ
38%
์ •์น˜
13%
Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
๊ฒฝ์ œ
๋ถ€์ •์ 

Cutting out the middleman

Every federal budget is a stark reminder of how much Pakistanโ€™s federal government is unable to spend within its means. Therefore, the burden to keep fiscal balance somewhat manageable falls on the same few sacrificial lambs, typically the formal sector in terms of collection and development needs for expenditure. Troublesome as it may be, the countryโ€™s gross public debt ratio of 70 per cent is not outrageously high by developing economy standards. However, one big problem is its concentration: over the past decade, commercial banks have held the bulk of the federal governmentโ€™s debt. Of Pakistanโ€™s Rs54.5 trillion in domestic debt, the bulk sits in marketable instruments, worth Rs46.6tr; of that, scheduled banks hold Rs36.8tr, or 79pc. Insurers account for under 5pc, mutual and pension funds for about 6pc, and a catch-all bucket of โ€œcorporates and othersโ€ for the rest. This makes the bank-sovereign nexus extreme by global standards. A World Bank analysis from the end of 2024 put Pakistani banksโ€™ public-debt holdings at roughly 60pc of total assets, four times the global median and the highest in a sample of over 80 countries. As a result, the effect on credit activity has been highly detrimental, with the industryโ€™s advances-to-deposits ratio hovering below 40pc and the share of small and medium enterprises barely 10pc of private-sector loans. Shift even a tenth of the Rs54tr domestic stock out of banks and into retail hands at a yield just 150 basis points cheaper, and the annual saving runs into the region of Rs80bn Since the two balance sheets of banking and sovereign are wound so tightly together, the relationship has curdled into something toxic. The government borrows from banks, taxes the profits from that borrowing, and banks push money away rather than put it to work. Somewhere in this loop, both the depositor and the real economy have been forgotten. When 79pc of the outstanding paper sits with a small club of institutional buyers, those buyers carry real pricing power into every auction; a market with retail savers, pension funds, insurers and foreign buyers each holding a meaningful slice generates competitive tension that bears down on yields, and a bank-dominated one simply does not. The institutional money that would normally provide that tension, chiefly the insurers, is too small to matter: at roughly 0.9pc of GDP against about 4pc in India, the entire sectorโ€™s asset base is smaller than a single year of government borrowing. That leaves retail, and on paper, the case for it is compelling. There are already millions of Pakistanis lending to the state through the old National Savings Schemes, currently holding Rs3.6tr. This segment has historically accepted lower yields than banks for the same sovereign credit, so widening the base could also trim the debt-servicing bill. A new policy InsightLab at the Karachi School of Business & Leadership, Karachi, argues that despite new instruments and platforms, the set of creditors holding Pakistanโ€™s debt has barely changed over the past seven years. Banks still hold the vast majority. The new channels changed how the debt is sold, but not who buys it. Shift even a tenth of the Rs54tr domestic stock, some Rs5.5tr, out of banks and into retail hands at a yield just 50 to 150 basis points cheaper, and the annual saving runs into the region of Rs25bn to 80bn. This would make a noticeable difference to the debt-servicing bill, which has become the single largest line in the budget and only compounds each year. There is a structural prize too. Banks gravitate toward short-term and floating-rate paper, largely because their liability mix forces them to do so. Pakistani banks hold hardly any fixed deposits, just Rs6.1tr out of Rs37.3tr, so they cannot comfortably warehouse long, fixed exposure. A genuine retail base anchored by long-dated household savings would take on the very tenor the banks shy away from, easing the rollover risk that the current profile does nothing to address. For a government desperate to rein in its largest expenditure line, retail is the rare lever that lowers both cost and risk at once. But the question is: how does the sovereign reach this segment? Historically, that answer was National Savings, though it is not without shortcomings. Its rates are set by administrative fiat in discrete steps, so they lag the market. This is attractive to savers when rates fall, but it is a structure that works against the stateโ€™s own objectives, is untradable, capped at Rs5 million, and is pitched more as quasi-social security for widows and retirees than as a serious financing tool. The second route runs through the capital markets by issuing Sukuk directly at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. But this has fared no better at changing who holds the paper. Since December 2023, the government has auctioned Ijarah Sukuk through the exchange to dazzling headline demand, yet the paper is fully Statutory Liquidity Requirement-eligible, individuals cannot bid directly when fewer than 1pc of citizens hold a brokerage account, and banks still end up holding close to 90pc of the stock. Third is the diaspora channel, the Roshan Digital Account, and truly the one relative win: over 927,000 accounts opened and more than $12.7bn received since 2020, though Naya Pakistan Certificates, the debt instrument inside it, have never crossed 2pc of government external debt. The newest effort tries to fix the access problem at its root. Investor Portfolio Securities (IPS) accounts have long let individuals hold government paper in principle, but in practice, the channel meant branch visits, manual forms, and bank staff with little incentive to promote it, so few ever used it. The State Bank of Pakistanโ€™s InvestPak portal, launched in November 2025, builds on that plumbing and strips out the friction. It does so by allowing individuals to open an IPS account, bid at auction, and trade securities entirely online. In theory, it is the most promising of the lot, with one catch: the access still routes through bank-maintained IPS accounts, the very institutions with no commercial reason to usher retail investors toward an asset class they would rather keep for themselves. India faced the same problem and took a different route. Its RBI Retail Direct scheme, launched in 2021, lets individuals hold government bonds in an account directly with the central bank, cutting out banks. If there is a single fix worth making, it is to stop flying blind. Pakistan now runs several parallel retail channels and publishes consolidated data on none of them, so nobody can actually say whether the needle is moving. The holder-wise statistics do not even carry a separate line for individual investors. The rest follows from there: a genuinely retail-sized product rather than the Rs100,000 minimum tickets that pass for one today, and an honest decision on whether to keep routing retail through the banks or, as India did, around them. None of this pays off in a single budget. But the concentration did not build itself overnight either, and years of inaction cannot be undone in days. After seven years of new instruments, the holder of last resort is still the bank. It will stay that way until the state builds something savers can actually use and a route that doesnโ€™t run through the institutions it is trying to move beyond. Mutaher Khan is co-founder of Data Darbar and Head of InsightLab at KSBL. Shahzaib Abbasi is an analysts at InsightLab. Published in Dawn, The Business and Finance Weekly, June 8th, 2026

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์‚ฌํšŒ
๋ถ€์ •์ 

LAW: OPEN LETTER TO JUNAID HAFEEZ

Junaid Hafeez | Social Media Dear Junaid Hafeez, We are writing to reassure you that, although we sentenced you to death nearly seven years ago, you should take some solace in the fact that we have never hanged anyone convicted of blasphemy. You might ask, if we donโ€™t intend to carry out the sentence, why for the past six years are we not listening to your appeal? Why are we denying you your day in the court? A day on which a judge can overturn your sentence and release you. Or go through the evidence against you and confirm your punishment, so that you can file another appeal and then another and, finally, when your death sentence is confirmed by the highest court in the land, you can file a last mercy petition. You have been waiting for 13 years to find out what it is that we intend to do with you. You might argue that, if you had committed second degree murder, got caught and convicted, with some good behaviour, you would be nearing the end of your sentence now. But you didnโ€™t kill anyone, you didnโ€™t commit treason, you hatched no plans to overthrow the government, you didnโ€™t challenge the authority of any institution. Instead, you read books, you talked about books, you wanted to live a bookish life, you went to a classroom, you were accused of blasphemy, you were sentenced to death. There may be a tacit promise by the state that youโ€™ll not see the gallows, but weโ€™ll also deny you the opportunity to prove your innocence and go home. Junaid Hafeez has been in jail on blasphemy charges since 2013. His appeal against his 2019 death sentence is pending in the Lahore High Court since 2020. May 18 was supposed to be yet another date for his hearing, which passed by without his appeal being heard You might think that in the 13 years (do you still count days or are you counting years now?) you have been behind bars, the world has forgotten you. But your name does appear on human rights organisationsโ€™ annual reports, your picture does come up on our social media memories. It has even been suggested that Junaid Hafeez gets more attention than hundreds of other victims of our slow justice, because itโ€™s easy to identify with him. He is every working class parentโ€™s dream boy, who tops every board exam, gets into Pakistanโ€™s top medical college and, midway through his medical education, decides to pursue a life of letters, gets a Fulbright fellowship, returns home and continues to teach and learn. Hereโ€™s the kind of boy we always say is the bright future of this country. There are many others who get far less attention than you. There are hundreds waiting trials, more than 50 who have been sentenced to death, their appeals not heard for years, sometimes for 10 sometimes for 20 years. In order to give you some hope, we might have given you Zafar Bhattiโ€™s example, a medicine salesman who spent 14 years in jail on blasphemy charges. Last year, he finally had his day in court, and he was freed. Freed. After keeping him in jail for 14 years, we declared that he was innocent. He went home. He died after three days. Three days of freedom after 14 years of captivity for a crime that never happened. Our judicial system is often blamed for being an impossibly slow grind, and for being extremely reluctant to take up the appeals of those convicted on blasphemy charges. It seems as if opening the case file of a blasphemy convict will constitute blasphemy itself. We canโ€™t judge our judges too harshly for not wanting to listen to these appeals. Letโ€™s not name names but lawyers, a judge, a minister and a governor have been assassinated trying to get the likes of you out of prison. Since judges have to deal with murderers and terrorists, they are promised life-time police protection. Although they are courageous enough to convict and then preside over the appeals of dangerous criminals, they are wary of having a blasphemy convict in their court. โ€œThey know our society, they know our system, why would they trust it?โ€ says your lawyer Asad Jamal. He also points out that the door to a hall on the premises of Lahore High Court Bar Association is named Baab-i-Khatm-i-Nabuwwat [Door of the Seal of the Prophets]. โ€œHereโ€™s a daily reminder to the judges of the times and places we live in.โ€ We can assure you though that times are changing. In the past one year, thereโ€™s been a spate of bails, acquittals and people have got what we call โ€˜reliefโ€™. A woman who was snared into a blasphemy trap after playing a game of PUBG was acquitted after five years of imprisonment. Last year, Anwar Kenneth, accused of blasphemy and sentenced to death, was acquitted after spending 23 years in jail. After keeping him in jail all this time, we realised that he wasnโ€™t mentally fit to stand a trial. Lawyers remind us that many of those accused of blasphemy have mental health issues. Itโ€™s difficult to prove in the court, as the psychiatrists who can testify for them are scared and either wouldnโ€™t appear or want to remain anonymous. Since we insist on keeping you alive and locked, we must give you some hope, however flimsy. Those who made blasphemy the central plank of their politics, and threatened generals and judges and politicians, have been silenced for now. We sometimes fear that your acquittal might poke those monsters we have put to sleep. Or people who decide such things still suspect that these monsters might be unshackled to liven up our political circus. In 2013, the year you went to jail, in India, they hanged Afzal Guru, a Kashmiri citizen accused of terrorism in India. The Indian Supreme Court said in its judgment that โ€œthe collective conscience of society will only be satisfied if capital punishment is awarded to the offender.โ€ Thereโ€™s no collective conscience here that needs to be satisfied. There are no hordes baying for your blood, only occasional voices pleading mercy, invoking your lost youth, your talent, your promise. You are a minor speck on our conscience because some of us are allowed to read books and write them and pursue our PhDs, but we canโ€™t grant you the same privileges. Many political analysts tell us that, if you are released tomorrow, no roads will be blocked in protest, no rallies will be held, the country will not burn, nobody will set fire to a tyre even. You are not being kept in a jail to satisfy our nationโ€™s conscience. You are not allowed your day in the court because then weโ€™ll have to face that conscience and decide. Your current lawyer, Mr Saiful Malook, obviously frustrated at not getting your appeal heard, reminds us of the constitutional guarantee that citizens shall not be discriminated against on the basis of caste or colour or religion. But he is not naรฏve and knows that this is not how our society and justice system works. He simply pleads for equality of the condemned. โ€œThe courts are listening to appeals filed in 2023 by those accused of multiple murders and even sentenced to death,โ€ he says. โ€œJunaidโ€™s appeal is from 2020 โ€” why isnโ€™t his appeal being heard? Even if we canโ€™t treat all citizens equally, at least those sentenced to death should be treated equally.โ€ What if judges are not scared for their safety but reluctant because of their faith? What if they donโ€™t even want to touch a case file containing blasphemies, even if fabricated? Islamabad-based lawyer Talha Rehman, who represents more than 60 people accused of blasphemy, says that if the judges are of the view that blasphemy laws are effective, then why are they reluctant to help implement them? โ€œThe least they can do is hear the appeals,โ€ he says, โ€œand, if they feel the punishment is justified, they should confirm it, so that the accused can move to the next appeal.โ€ Dear Junaid, as you count your days and years and wait for your day in court, we reiterate that we have never hanged anyone accused of and convicted of blasphemy. But weโ€™ll fit a noose around your neck every morning and take it off every night. So that our conscience doesnโ€™t bother us in our sleep. The writer is a novelist, essayist and journalist. His latest novel is Rebel English Academy Published in Dawn, EOS, May 31st, 2026

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์‚ฌํšŒ
๊ธ์ •์ 

Delhi reclaims its Gymkhana. Lahore keeps its elite club for Rs5,000 a year

The Delhi Gymkhana Club was born in 1913, raised for British officers and the colonial set, and was later inherited by bureaucrats, politicians, and the comfortably connected. None of that pedigree could save it, however, from the law. Last week India told it to vacate the land by June 5. The government read a single clause from the clubโ€™s own lease, named a public purpose, and issued the notice. The land returns to the state as do the buildings on it. The club says it will fight the decision in court, and it may. But the order is out and the clock has started. In Pakistan, the Lahore Gymkhana was born in the same year, is grander than Delhiโ€™s and also sits on land worth a kingโ€™s ransom. But no notice to vacate has been issued. These are the facts from the government documents that explain why. India has ordered the Delhi Gymkhana Club to vacate its premises by June 5 โ€” Credits: BBC 38 paisas a kanal The Lahore Gymkhana sits on state land ringed by The Mall, Jail Road, and Zafar Ali Road. There is no pricier address in the province. Its 1913 lease stretches back to the Raj, and has been repeatedly extended in 1921, 1960, and, in haste in 1996, five years before its expiry. This time it was extended for 50 years to cover the years 2000 to 2050. The gymkhana estate sprawls over 112 acres and the club holds three kanal and 16 marlas more than the record of rights allows โ€” a tiny trespass that nobody thought to note until now. But that is not all. Inside Lawrence Gardens (Bagh-e-Jinnah), the Gymkhana keeps an exclusive cricket ground on three-and-a-half acres of the Agriculture Department. This was never part of the lease, there is no grant for it and no rent is paid. No paper explains how a public garden was fenced off for a private game. For the main estate, the club pays Rs5000 a year in rent. Not per kanal. In total. That comes to Rs417 a month, or under fifty paisas per kanal, for some of the most valuable earth in Pakistan. How little is Rs5000? Consider it against the governmentโ€™s upper commercial rate. Total land 1,091 kanals 21,820 marla Market value 1,091 ร— Rs200 million/kanal Rs218.2 billion Fair annual rent 21,820 marla ร— Rs200,000/marla Rs4.364 billion The land is worth Rs218 billion so fair rent would be about Rs4.36 billion a year. Under the governmentโ€™s 2023 policy, clubs can pay a tenth of market rent, but this would still come to Rs400 million a year. The club pays Rs5000. For years, the landโ€™s real value sat behind a nominal colonial rent. It became visible when market figures were placed on the record. The admissions of guilt The club filed its defence with the Assembly admitting the buildings came after the lease, which said the government had to approve construction. Over the decades the club built its clubhouse, golf clubhouse, pool, two guest blocks, health club, administration block, mosque and a cafรฉ in 2012. The Board of Revenue searched for permissions but none were on record. The club has not even paid its token Rs5,000 rent. The Additional Deputy Commissionerโ€™s office sent a notice, dated 26 August 2020, saying that rent had not bee paid since 2011. Then the money. The club swears no public funds reach it but then lists them in the next breath: Rs2 million from President Zia in 1985, Rs2 million from PM Nawaz Sharif the same year, Rs50 million from CM Pervaiz Elahi in 2006, Rs10 million from CM Shehbaz Sharif in 2014. Four heads of government, four gifts from the public purse, to a private club. And who is the club for? Its rulebook answers. Every civil servant of Grade 18 and above may join for a token fee, and so may every commissioned officer of the armed forces. The other way to become a member is to inherit membership. The capture is not an accident of history. It is written into the founding charter. The roll of ordinary members, meanwhile, the club guards as confidential as if it were a list belonging to a Freemason Lodge. The instinct to maintain secrecy runs deep. When citizens used the Right to Information law to ask for the lease and the donor records, the club refused, and carried its refusal to the Lahore High Court, pleading, without blushing, that as a public limited company it was no โ€œpublic bodyโ€ and owed the public nothing. In January 2023, the court dismissed the plea. The land belongs to the state, the judge held. Handing over land worth billions of rupees almost free was an enormous benefit and rent of Rs5,000 a year โ€œcannot be even termed as any rate whatsoever.โ€ The same shrug was then offered to the Assembly when it asked who the clubโ€™s members were. Lahore Gymkhana โ€” Credits: Express Tribune Institutionalising the giveaway The Gymkhana is no aberration. It is the template: in May 2023 the state made the template law. That month, a caretaker government in Punjab, an unelected stopgap whose only charge was to hold an election, approved a sweeping new policy. It had no mandate to make long-term land decisions but it made one anyway. On May 10 2023, the Colonies Department opened the door to hand prime state land to gymkhana clubs across the province, and fixed their rent at a tenth of market value. The discount was sewn into the rules. The Board of Revenue reports the harvest. The figure that matters is what the clubs actually pay, after the 90 per cent is shaved away: Rs20,000 an acre a year at Dera Ghazi Khan, Mandi Bahauddin, and Chiniot; Rs50,000 at Vehari, Sahiwal, and Dera Ghazi Khan; Rs60,000 at Kamalpur Syedaan in Attock; Rs100,000 at Saddar Gymkhana, Gujranwala; Rs120,000 at Jhang; Rs140,000 at Jhelum and Gujranwala City. An acre of prime city land, for the price of a secondhand motorcycle, every year. And the final irony: this generous policy, the Board says, does not reach the Lahore Gymkhana, because its lease is older. Elite enclaves on public land The Gymkhana is not the only refuge for the officer class in Lahore. Inside the GOR, that broad expanse of prime central land set aside for officialdom, stands the Punjab Civil Officers Mess on Tollington Road. At GORโ€™s gate stands the colonial Punjab Club. A short walk off, the Lahore Polo Club keeps its grounds and stables inside the Race Course, public parkland surrendered to horses and a handful of players. An exclusive school for the male heirs of the elite, Aitchison College (Chiefโ€™s College), spreads over 200 acres. None of these entities bought their land. It is public land, held in trust, enjoyed by the few. Islamabad tells the same story more starkly. The Islamabad Club, sprawled across 352 acres of CDA land, pays about three rupees an acre a month as its gates remain closed to ordinary citizens. The Gun and Country Club rose up on land meant for the Pakistan Sports Board; the Supreme Court declared it illegal in 2018 and ordered the land to be taken back, yet years later auditors could not trace some 38 acres, and the club sat on roughly 37 with no deed, no lease, no licence at all. The court said it aloud: there was no land in Islamabad for a public hospital [for the poor], but there was land aplenty for clubs for the rich. And the hunger has not eased. In Multan, the district administration moves to slice 15 acres off the Central Cotton Research Institute, founded in 1970, the cradle of more than forty cotton varieties, including the regionโ€™s first virus-free strain, to feed another gymkhana, while the countryโ€™s cotton reserves sit at a record low and we spend hard currency importing the very crop the institute exists to improve. The Pakistan Business Forum has written to the chief minister to stop it. The clubs took the parks. Now they reach into the seed bank. There has been an attempt to quantify this. In 2021, the UNDP put a number on the privileges captured by Pakistanโ€™s elite. Cheap land and capital, tax breaks and soft inputs came to about $17.4 billion a year, which is nearly 6pc of the whole economy. The Gymkhana is merely a place where one may stand and watch the transfer happen: a 112 acres, for Rs5000. When the same hands value, grant, and enjoy the land This mechanism endures not through sloth but through strategy, as the actors make clear. The land belongs to the state. The men who grant it are senior civil servants in the Colonies Department, the Board of Revenue, the office of the Deputy Commissioner. The men who set the value of the land, and thus decide the rent, are with the same revenue service. And the men who enjoy the clubs are, by rule, civil servants of Grade 18 and above and senior officers of the armed forces. The same hands own the land, price the land, rent it, and carry the membership cards. When one cadre handles every aspect of a deal, its low price is no blunder. It is the purpose. No one at that table has any interest in making public land fetch a public price, for all of them gain from the opposite. The officer who would raise the rent, enforce the breach, or cancel the lease must act against his service, his colleagues, and likely his own leisure. That is what makes Sohaib Buttโ€™s report so rare, and so telling. It took a man willing to go against the grain of his service to do the simplest thing: write down what the land is worth. This is the truth worth stating plainly. In Pakistan, real power does not change hands at the ballot box. Governments arrive and depart; the bureaucracy and elites abide. And on the matter of state land for clubs, those who never leave office and those who enjoy the clubs are one and the same. That is why such a file scarcely moves. And it is why it matters so greatly who, in the end, forced it into the open. Nestled within the Bagh-e-Jinnah, is one of the most picturesque cricket arenas of the world โ€” Credits: Dawn archives Two-tiered justice The state can, of course, move on land with great speed if it wants. Take Islamabad, the capital that prides itself on order. For three months its bulldozers have flattened katchi abadis or the informal colonies where the cityโ€™s gardeners and nannies, washerwomen and labourers have lived for a generation. Around 25,000 people were driven out of Mulism Colony in Bari Imam alone. Settlements a quarter-century old, Rimsha Colony in H-9 and the largely Christian Allama Iqbal Colony in G-7, were marked for the same fate, along with the ancient villages of Saidpur and Nurpur Shahan.The stateโ€™s housing policy counts 60 such settlements in the city, home to between 300,000 and half a million souls; the CDA recognises barely 10 as lawful and brands the rest squatters. And here is the part that should silence the room: a Supreme Court order from 2015 was passed after the merciless clearance of the I-11 settlement left 25,000 people homeless. It stayed the summary evictions altogether. The bulldozers came regardless. The same legal system that cannot dislodge an unpaid colonial lease in 18 months had no trouble dislodging the poor in open defiance of its highest court. Punjab is no kinder about informality. It is just quieter about it. For three decades, it has promised to regularise its katchi abadis, and for three decades that promise has mostly stayed on paper. There is a law to sanction the work done and an agency to get it done but the number of settlements grows faster than the lists of โ€œregularisedโ€ ones. Surveys are started and abandoned. Notifications are issued and forgotten. The poor who put up their housing on the edges of Lahore and Faisalabad and Rawalpindi live out their years in limbo, always one bureaucratโ€™s signature away from eviction. Three decades is a lifetime. A child born in one of these colonies has grown, married, and had children, and the family still cannot say for certain that the ground beneath their feet is legally theirs. Meanwhile, the new law enforcer is punishing and swift. The Punjab government created the Punjab Enforcement and Regulatory Authority (PERA), to clear what it deemed to be encroachments. It is aided by deputy and assistant commissioners and a uniformed force with black Vigos. Through 2025 PERA hired thousands of staff and opened stations across Lahore and beyond, as its drives targeted the small folk. Traders protested its methods: a shop photographed in the evening, sealed the next morning, fined Rs10,000 to Rs25,000, kept shut until the owner paid. Thella wallahs, vendors, kiosks punished for setting up on a footpath. But 112 acres of the cityโ€™s finest land, held on a dead lease, built over without leave, exempted by a rule the board invented, is โ€œlegitimate possession,โ€ defended for generations. The bulldozer works swiftly for the weak but stalls for the strong. What Rs218 billion could buy instead of membership It is worth listing what Rs218 billion would buy in a place that cannot pay for medicine. In 2025-26, Punjab set aside Rs630.5 billion for its health sector, and proudly announced that for the first time this included Rs79.5 billion for free medicine. And yet Dawn reported that Rawalpindiโ€™s three public hospitals (Holy Family, Benazir Bhutto, and the Teaching Hospital) were given a fraction of Rs4.5 billion they asked for. Their vendors are refusing to deliver stocks until the bills are cleared. The Lahore Gymkhana land, on the other hand, is worth Rs218 billion, or three times the free medicine funding. A single elite golf-and-dining estate, that pays Rs5000 in rent, is worth more than the tab for medicines in a province of 120 million people. The Assembly did its job It took an elected Assembly more than one attempt to set this right. The matter was brought up at the last session but did not move ahead for โ€œmysteriousโ€ reasons. The House pressed further. A member moved an adjournment motion and the Speaker called it out: this was elite capture of state land. The Speaker formed a committee and for the first time in history, opened its hearings to the public and TV cameras. The Houseโ€™s members killed it at the first sitting by placing on the record, all of them, that they sought no membership of the club, only the public interest. In a few weeks they ferreted out from their government two documents that settled everything. The first was the valuation, ADC(R) report (shown above), which turned Rs5,000 into a scandal by comparison. The second document ended the argument. The Law and Parliamentary Affairs Department gave a clean opinion on what the state may do: Clause 6 of the 1996 lease lets the government end the lease at any time, on six monthsโ€™ notice. Clause 8 says that when it ends, the club is owed nothing for any building it raised. The Board of Revenue added that the state is bound to resume the land when public purpose requires it, or when the lease is broken. India reclaimed its gymkhana land by reading one clause of a lease. Punjabโ€™s lawyers have now confirmed the province holds the same power to take back the Rs218 billion estate, with every building on it, on six monthsโ€™ notice, and pay nothing. Credit for this denouement goes to the House of elected representatives. What they cannot do alone is sign the order. That pen rests with the executive, which is the same bureaucracy that would rather keep the file shut. Inside Lahore Gymkhana Cricket Museum, the first of its kind in Pakistan โ€” Credits: Dawn archives Options The remedy is not exotic. The simplest one is to cancel the lease. The second option is to take back the land for public use, which is what Delhi did. We donโ€™t need to look far to find precedent. When the Royal Palm Club in Lahore defaulted on its lease of Railways land, the state took the land back and pulled down structures. Indeed, members on both benches have said if it can be done to a club on railway land in Lahore, it can be done to a club on nazul (state) land in Lahore. The most durable option is a legal statute to dedicate the gymkhana estate to a fixed public use. And one use should unite the benches. The estate is a manicured, thirsty green in one of the most poisoned cities on earth. Take it back. Grow a native forest on it the fast and thick Miyawaki way and plan a park. Such greenery traps the dust, cools the air, and pushes back against the smog that sends people to our hospitals each winter. A golf course serves a hundred men. A forest would serve millions. We say the law protects everyone alike but we must admit it does not. The thella wallah is presumed to be illegal and is not given time to prove otherwise. The Lahore Gymkhana Club is presumed to be lawful no matter what the file says. Delhi has shown us the way. There was never a question of what the law allowed if elite land had to be taken back. The Assembly has proven this twice and put proof on record. What remains is the will to choose a public forest or park over a private fairway, the many over the few, the medicine over the membership. The House has spoken. The executive has not. For now, the silence belongs to the people holding the pen, and everyone can see why they would rather not sign.

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์‚ฌํšŒ
๊ธ์ •์ 

PTI leaders expelled from Gilgit-Baltistan, decry โ€˜lack of level playing fieldโ€™

ISLAMABAD: Four PTI leaders, including the partyโ€™s general secretary, were expelled from Gilgit-Baltistan while local leaders were detained on Tuesday. General elections in GB are scheduled for Sunday (June 7), after a four-month delay attributed to harsh winter weather. According to the PTI leadership, the party is not being allowed to campaign in the upcoming elections. โ€œToday, upon entering Gilgit-Baltistan, I, along with Shaukat Basra, Naeem Panjutha, and Zaheer Babar, was stopped by the police within the jurisdiction of Jal Police Station and prevented from proceeding further,โ€ PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja claimed in a post on X. โ€œThe DSP informed us that my name had been specifically listed in their records. We and our colleagues from the Insaf Student Federation (ISF) were subsequently surrounded by police vehicles and forcibly escorted out of the province,โ€ claimed the PTI general secretary. Raja said that these actions โ€œrepresent an attempt to restrict our constitutional right to free movement and political activityโ€. โ€œSuch measures cannot suppress the voice of the people or their democratic aspirations. The nation has already made its decision: it stands with Imran Khan and the cause of freedom,โ€ he added. Talking to Dawn, Raja said that party leaders were travelling to GB by road, as PTI stalwart and former National Assembly speaker Asad Qaiser had earlier not been allowed to travel by air. Similarly, PTI lawmaker Junaid Akbar was also expelled from the region. โ€œWhen we reached the area of Jal police station in Diamer District, we were stopped by the police,โ€ he alleged. โ€œThe police officer was already aware that I was going to Gilgit-Baltistan. They told us that they had orders not to allow us to go there. I asked them who had given the orders, but they said, โ€˜You can understand who has given us the orders,โ€™โ€ he added. Raja added that the police travelled with the PTI leaders until they reached Babusar Top, at which point they returned. Shaukat Basra, while talking to Dawn, said that the people of GB were supporting PTI, and that was why the government was scared of the partyโ€™s election campaign. โ€œThey are not giving us a level playing field for the elections, but I believe that the strategy of the government will backfire. While we were expelled, the local leaders and workers of the ISF, who had come to receive us, were arrested by the police,โ€ he added. Meanwhile, PTI Secretary Information Sheikh Waqas Akram strongly condemned the incident, comparing it with the general elections held on February 8, 2024. According to Akram, Raja and other party leaders were barred from entering GB and sent back, a โ€œrepeat of the suppression tactics used against PTI leadership ahead of and during the 2024 general electionsโ€. He claimed that police were being provided lists and were identifying and stopping PTI-affiliated individuals from entering the region. Akram said the alleged action โ€œconstitutes a clear violation of the Constitution and democratic principlesโ€. Furthermore, he said a systematic campaign was being carried out in the name of issuing no-objection certificates (NOCs), mirroring the administrative hurdles and restrictions imposed on PTI candidates and workers across Pakistan in February 2024. He said ruling parties, particularly the PML-N and PPP, were enjoying full state patronage. โ€œThe administration is providing them with facilities and protocol for their public meetings, while every door is being shut on PTI, a clear replication of the one-sided state support extended to these parties in February 2024โ€, he said. Earlier today, political bigwigs sought to garner public support in GB as PML-N President Nawaz Sharif and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari addressed rallies. Bilawal said the region should be afforded the same rights and protections that other provinces enjoy under the 18th Amendment. Meanwhile, the PML-N supremo lamented the lack of development in the region. โ€œI am speaking to you after many years. Isnโ€™t that the case? Perhaps you have forgotten me,โ€ Nawaz said while addressing the public in Gilgit, prompting roaring chants in his support. The PML-N president then assured the GB residents that he would hold a meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and ask him to expand the airport so that commercial jets could operate there.

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์ •์น˜
๊ธ์ •์ 

Political bigwigs attempt to sway Gilgit-Baltistan as electioneering heats up ahead of June 7 polls

Political bigwigs on Tuesday sought to garner public support in Gilgit-Baltistan (BG) as PML-N President Nawaz Sharif and PPP Chairman Bilawal-Bhutto Zardari addressed rallies ahead of the June 7 elections. General elections in GB are scheduled for Sunday, after a four-month delay attributed to harsh winter weather. Addressing a public gathering in Skardu, where First Lady Aseefa Bhutto-Zardari was also present, Bilawal called for greater rights for the people of GB. โ€œI have to struggle along with GBโ€™s new generation [โ€ฆ] If we have to implement the manifesto of roti, kapra, makaan in its true sense, then we will have to work on three rules โ€” we will have to attain the right to haq-i-hakimiyat (right to govern), haq-i-malkiyat (right to ownership), and haq-i-rozgaar (right to employment),โ€ Bilawal said. He further said, โ€œThe struggle of PPPโ€™s new generation will be to get you your right to govern, and that will happen when GB will get the protections, facilities and powers provided in the 18th Amendment.โ€ Bilawal had begun his speech by condemning Israeli attacks on Iran. Recalling the US-Israelโ€™s deadly strikes on Iran, including one that killed students at a school, as well as the assassination of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Bilawal said it did not seem โ€œappropriate to run an election campaignโ€ in an elaborate manner. โ€œI toured GB on foot in the last elections. I wanted to do the same this time,โ€ he said, adding that there was an โ€œair of griefโ€ for the people in GB and him. The PPP chairman praised Pakistanโ€™s ongoing efforts for peace in the region, including the role played by CDF Munir. โ€œIt is extremely important that the effort for peace succeeds, because the people of Iran and Palestine and the entire Muslim world are bearing the burden of this war, but at the same time, the entire worldโ€™s youth are also facing that burden,โ€ he said, noting the conflictโ€™s economic impact and the resulting inflation. The Bhutto scion asserted that the PPP was the โ€œonly party that represents the underprivileged and the poorโ€. โ€œWe first think of the underprivileged, then we ask the developing. We first think of the labourers, then ask the business people. We first ask the farmers, then ask the landlords,โ€ he added. Bilawal emphasised that the country could only develop once the working masses and the youth were economically empowered, claiming that other political parties were in favour of making the affluent wealthier. โ€œProgress is when the farmer gets their hard workโ€™s fruit, progress is when employment opportunities are created for the youth,โ€ he said, recalling that the policies of his grandfather Zulfikar Ali Bhutto โ€œmade labourers the owners of millsโ€. He went on to recall a slogan from the tenure of his mother, ex-premier Benazir Bhutto โ€” โ€œBenazir aye gi, rozgaar laye gi [Benazir will come, and bring employment]โ€ โ€” prompting the supporters to raise the same chants. He also praised his father, President Asif Ali Zardari, for launching the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) during his previous tenure as president. Earlier in the day, ex-premier Nawaz reached Gilgit for a one-day visit and lamented the lack of development in the region. โ€œI am speaking to you after many years. Isnโ€™t that the case? Perhaps you have forgotten me,โ€ Nawaz said while addressing the public in Gilgit, prompting roaring chants in his support. Noting that he was fond of mountains, Nawaz stressed he โ€œwholeheartedly lovedโ€ GB. โ€œWhen I love the area from my heart, then why would I not love the people from my heart? You live in my heart,โ€ he quipped. The PML-N chief then went on to lament the lack of development in the region. โ€œWhen I saw the condition of the roads after exiting the airport, I cannot even describe it. It hurt me immensely. Where is the Gilgit that I used to know?โ€ he said. โ€œMy heart cries on why this was allowed, why the money that should have been spent on you all was not done so,โ€ Nawaz remarked. Noting there were โ€œso many potholesโ€, Nawaz recalled that the PML-N had in the past worked on constructing roads and asked why the project was not extended to Gilgit as originally planned. โ€œI do not want to speak against any party or government, but my heart urges me to ask them that you got the chance to serve this country, then why did you ignore this area?โ€ the ex-premier asked. He added that the PML-N did not seek votes by criticising other parties, but rather based on the work it did. โ€œThe road that I had started was not built up to here, it should have been and then built further till Khunjerab,โ€ he said, highlighting that building the road till Skardu had cost Rs50 billion. โ€œIt is the right of the people of GB, not a favour that I am doing to you,โ€ he added. The ex-premier highlighted that the PML-N government had constructed hospitals, power plants and hydel power plants. โ€œTell me if any other party has even placed a brick here,โ€ he jibed, with supporters responding in the negative. โ€œIt saddens me that the airport has remained the same as it was in my tenure,โ€ Nawaz said, pointing out that it had not been expanded and the air traffic to the tourist hotspot had not increased. The PML-N president then assured the GB residents that he would hold a meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and ask him to expand the airport so that commercial jets could operate there. Flaunting the shortened commute time from Gilgit to Skardu, Nawaz said, โ€œWe reduced a nine-hour journey to three hours, saving you six hours, making things easy for your kids and families.โ€ The former premier lamented, โ€œProjects are launched here but they are never seen completed.โ€ He highlighted that there was great potential for generating hydel and solar electricity in the region. Noting load-shedding of over 20 hours in winters and of up to 12 hours in summers, he said, โ€œIt is unacceptable to me.โ€ Nawaz said that regardless of whether the PML-N wins the elections or not, โ€œwe cannot keep you deprived of these thingsโ€, vowing to speak to PM Shehbaz about electricity outages in GB. The PML-N supremo said he will urge both PM Shehbaz and his daughter, Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, to visit GB, also pledging to visit the region every two to three months if his party is elected. Nawaz also mentioned his last ouster during his speech, recalling that he had formed a committee as the prime minister in 2017 on GBโ€™s share in the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award. โ€œDo not complain to me. I am not ready to hear this grievance because this is your fault as well, that why you let a person like me be exiled,โ€ he said. โ€œWhy did I have to leave the country and go abroad? Why were [we] jailed?โ€ Terming GB the โ€œcentreโ€ of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Nawaz called for it to be developed further, with electric buses launched and hospitals built. He vowed that the cancer hospital built by the PML-N in GB would be expanded. He also advocated for housing loan schemes for the residents of GB and interest-free loan programmes for youth for their businesses. The PML-N president also pledged to have a womenโ€™s university constructed if his party got the chance to govern the region. โ€œIt is exam day for you three days from now,โ€ Nawaz quipped, referring to the polling day. Nawaz was also set to meet with party ticket holders during his GB visit. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, Inter-Provincial Coordination Minister Rana Sanaullah, Punjab Senior Provincial Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb, senators Pervaiz Rasheed and Anusha Rahman, and MPA Kazim Ali Pirzada were accompanying Nawaz, state-run PTV said. Minister for Kashmir Affairs and GB Amir Muqam, Nawazโ€™s son-in-law retired captain Mohammad Safdar, PML-Nโ€™s former GB chief minister Hafiz Hafeezur Rehman and other party members welcomed the PML-N supremo upon his arrival. In a post on X earlier in the day, the PML-N said the Election Commission of GB had issued a no-objection certificate allowing Nawaz to visit GB and โ€œlead his partyโ€™s political campaign for the upcoming general electionsโ€. Elected as an MNA in the February 2024 general elections, Nawaz makes rare public appearances. However, he serves as the PML-Nโ€™s key decision-maker and as a political mentor to CM Maryam. Earlier in April, Nawaz had vowed that, if elected in GB, the party would focus on development in the region. Saad Rafique calls for โ€˜comprehensive planโ€™ for GBโ€™s constitutional status Prior to Nawazโ€™s arrival, senior PML-N leader and former federal minister Khawaja Saad Rafique addressed a gathering in Skardu, where he emphasised the need to address the issue of GBโ€™s constitutional rights through a โ€œcomprehensive planโ€. โ€œTill how long will the issue (GBโ€™s constitutional status) remain undecided?โ€ Rafique asked, stressing that while โ€œKashmir was an important issue, but so was the future of the people of GBโ€. โ€œThe time has come for the parliament to debate the matter,โ€ he said, adding that it was the collective responsibility of all parties, state institutions and security institutions to take GB forward. The PML-N leader further called for an equitable share for GB and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) in the NFC Award. He also said that Nawaz would announce the partyโ€™s โ€œcharterโ€ during his GB visit. Noting the lack of development in the region, Rafique acknowledged that โ€œno government will be able to solve everything in five yearsโ€. However, he emphasised, a direction for the future could be determined. โ€œThe PML-N laid down that foundation in their last tenure,โ€ he added. Recalling that the region had seen tenures of three different parties, he called on the people to โ€œvote for whoever did the most workโ€. โ€œSeven to eight flights operate from here every day; this can be quadrupled, dams can be made,โ€ Rafique said, outlining potential for โ€œsmall viable projects to tackle GBโ€™s electricity issuesโ€ as well as improved internet and road connectivity in the region.

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์ •์น˜
๊ธ์ •์ 

'My heart cries': Nawaz laments lack of development in GB ahead of polls

Former prime minister and PML-N President Nawaz Sharif on Tuesday lamented the lack of development in Gilgit-Baltistan, as he made a brief visit to the region ahead of elections there. General elections in GB are scheduled for June 7, after a four-month delay attributed to harsh winter weather. โ€œI am speaking to you after many years. Isnโ€™t that the case? Perhaps you have forgotten me,โ€ Nawaz said while addressing the public in Gilgit, prompting roaring chants in his support. Noting that he was fond of mountains, Nawaz stressed he โ€œwholeheartedly lovedโ€ GB. โ€œWhen I love the area from my heart, then why would I not love the people from my heart? You live in my heart,โ€ he quipped. The PML-N chief then went on to lament the lack of development in GB. โ€œWhen I saw the condition of the roads after exiting the airport, I cannot even describe it. It hurt me immensely. Where is the Gilgit that I used to know?โ€ he said. โ€œMy heart cries on why this was allowed, why the money that should have been spent on you all was not done so,โ€ Nawaz remarked. Noting there were โ€œso many potholesโ€, Nawaz recalled that the PML-N had in the past worked on constructing roads and asked why the project was not extended to Gilgit as originally planned. โ€œI do not want to speak against any party or government, but my heart urges me to ask them that you got the chance to serve this country, then why did you ignore this area?โ€ the ex-premier asked. He added that the PML-N did not seek votes by criticising other parties, but rather based on the work it did. โ€œThe road that I had started was not built upto here, it should have been and then built further till Khunjerab,โ€ he said, highlighting that the cost of building the road till Skardu had cost Rs50 billion. โ€œIt is the right of people of GB, not a favour that I am doing to you,โ€ he added. Nawaz is also set to meet with party ticket holders contesting the polls. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, Inter-Provincial Coordination Minister Rana Sanaullah, Punjab Senior Provincial Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb, senators Pervaiz Rasheed and Anusha Rahman, and MPA Kazim Ali Pirzada are accompanying Nawaz, state-run PTV said. Minister for Kashmir Affairs and GB Amir Muqam, Nawazโ€™s son-in-law retired captain Mohammad Safdar, PML-Nโ€™s former GB chief minister Hafiz Hafeezur Rehman and other party members welcomed the PML-N supremo upon his arrival. In a post on X earlier in the day, the PML-N said the Election Commission of GB had issued a no-objection certificate allowing Nawaz to visit GB and โ€œlead his partyโ€™s political campaign for the upcoming general electionsโ€. Elected as an MNA in the February 2024 general elections, Nawaz makes rare public appearances. However, he serves as the PML-Nโ€™s key decision-maker and as a political mentor to his daughter, Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz. Earlier in April, Nawaz had vowed that, if elected in GB, the party would focus on development in the region. Saad Rafique calls for โ€˜comprehensive planโ€™ for GBโ€™s constitutional status Earlier on Tuesday, senior PML-N leader and former federal minister Khawaja Saad Rafique addressed a gathering in Skardu, where he emphasised the need to address the issue of GBโ€™s constitutional rights through a โ€œcomprehensive planโ€. โ€œTill how long will the issue (GBโ€™s constitutional status) remain undecided?โ€ Rafique asked, stressing that while โ€œKashmir was an important issue, but so was the future of the people of GBโ€. โ€œThe time has come for the parliament to debate the matter,โ€ he said, adding that it was the collective responsibility of all parties, state institutions and security institutions to take GB forward. The PML-N leader further called for an equitable share for GB and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) in the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award. He also said that Nawaz would announce the partyโ€™s โ€œcharterโ€ during his GB visit. Noting the lack of development in the region, Rafique acknowledged that โ€œno government will be able to solve everything in five yearsโ€. However, he emphasised, a direction for the future could be determined. โ€œPML-N laid down that foundation in their last tenure,โ€ he added. Recalling that the region had seen tenures of three different parties, he called on the people to โ€œvote for whoever did the most workโ€. โ€œSeven to eight flights operate from here every day; this can be quadrupled, dams can be made,โ€ Rafique said, outlining potential for โ€œsmall viable projects to tackle GBโ€™s electricity issuesโ€ as well as improved internet and road connectivity in the region. More to follow

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์ •์น˜
๋ถ€์ •์ 

Back to the people

POLITICS in Pakistan appears to be dead. However, this is only because of the beating it has taken. Like whack-a-mole, it pops up when least expected. The moment headlines about international events no longer take up all the oxygen in the room, the fractious world of Pakistani politics begins to draw attention to itself. It was no different this time around. Once the US-Iran saga settled into โ€˜deal is a-cominโ€™โ€™, commentary here focused on how the foreign policy successes had not translated into any relief for inflation-afflicted Pakistanis. By now, questions have multiplied about the mess that is the economy. These questions will simply grow as budget time draws closer and summer power bills multiply. Thatโ€™s not all. The impending elections in Gilgit-Baltistan and beyond have highlighted the same issues that the government and others have been at pains to ignore. Elections in GB are scheduled to be held this month, after a delay of around four months due to โ€˜bad weatherโ€™. Elections for around 24 directly elected seats will take place in the first week of June. Keeping precedent in mind, the electoral trend favours the party in power in Islamabad. But those on the ground are not so sure. According to them, voters tend to see the government in Islamabad as a coalition and hence expect a similar mish-mash in poll results โ€” some form of a PML-N-PPP combine. And because the Istehkam-i-Pakistan Party (of the Aleem Khan fame) is also campaigning hard there, the guess is that it may also have been promised something. It is difficult for a couch potato to tell how much of the result will come from the voting and how much from the powers who cannot be named. Letโ€™s not forget the rumours regarding the need to remind the PPP of its place in the system. However, many people have worked hard to ensure that there will be questions about the electionโ€™s credibility. One party is โ€” as expected โ€” without an election symbol. And its leadership has been stopped from campaigning freely; Junaid Akbar was stopped while Asad Qaiser claims he was prevented from boarding a flight to the region. Such ham-handed tactics are hard to understand in a region which has rarely ever gone against Islamabad but they have strengthened the perception that the PTI is popular there. This is not to say politics is limited to the crackdown on the PTI. Essentially, and beyond political parties, the real issue is about a state unwilling to grant space to ordinary people. Consider Azad Kashmir. Elections in the area will be held around July but the government is already worried. The discontent there is no secret, though reporting on it remains limited. The protests last year were controlled or subdued by eventually holding negotiations with protesters led by the Joint Awami Action Committee, which enjoys widespread and cross-party support. These included a change in government โ€” a coalition government led by dissident PTI wallahs was replaced by the PPP. Many of the demands of the protesters were agreed to while implementation and negotiations continued. The real issue is about a state unwilling to grant space to ordinary people. However, the issue of refugee seats outside Kashmir continues to hang fire. Elections are held on these seats outside AJK, though the victors are part of the AJK legislature. The committee wants the seats abolished because the perception is that these seats are won through manipulation and that these legislators are used to make and break governments at othersโ€™ behest. But unlike many of the other issues, it has been hard to reach an agreement on the matter. It was one of the key demands of the committee but the government was not very keen to address it. With elections approaching, the problem is becoming urgent. Over the weekend, the two sides had carried out lengthy negotiations which ended without resolution and so far the committeeโ€™s call for a protest in the first week of June remains on the table. Whether or not there can be a breakthrough before that is unclear. The government will make an effort to talk and negotiate again but whether they can reach an understanding which satisfies both sides is unclear. However, in each case the plotline is in many ways familiar: be it the economy overall, the general elections or election time in special regions, people want change. Change in the manner in which the economy is run; change in the way elections are managed; change in how their voice is heard and heeded. At the other end, there is the status quo. One can call it the โ€˜establishmentโ€™, โ€˜traditional partiesโ€™, electables, economic and other elites who are comfortable and averse to changing a system that affords them influence and wealth. So people are, for different reasons in different regions, growing resentful. Somewhere, the anger is suppressed and elsewhere it is apparent in protests. But instead of understanding the crisis, those in power continue to try and clamp down. Negotiations and talks are seen as an option only when the use of force doesnโ€™t prove effective. But this option is also selectively applied. For instance, protests in the region got out of hand when the government finally sat down with the JAAC. In GB earlier this year, the sectarian issue led to violence but the effort to hold talks later wasnโ€™t all that successful and was overshadowed by the Iran war. Many of us had forgotten AJK, but now it is back in the news. Soon it will be the turn of some other region in the country. Itโ€™s hard to tell which one, but the simmering continues in many places. Any place can boil over if we donโ€™t pay attention. The writer is a journalist. Published in Dawn, June 2nd, 2026

Dawn (Pakistan)
์ง„๋ณด ์„ฑํ–ฅ
์‚ฌํšŒ
๋ถ€์ •์ 

SMOKERSโ€™ CORNER: COUNTER HISTORIES

In last weekโ€™s column, I discussed how certain Pakistani historians challenged the โ€˜reactionaryโ€™ national narrative constructed by the state after 1971, when the countryโ€™s eastern wing violently broke away to become Bangladesh. The post-1971 narrative amplified Political Islam, weaving it into what was officially branded as the โ€œPakistan Ideologyโ€ in 1978. Though some historians began dismantling this construct in the 1980s, it took another three decades for their efforts to bear fruit. Today, the state has not only softened its stance towards these counter-narratives, but is actively borrowing elements from them to fashion a brand-new national identity. This emerging narrative seeks to reposition Pakistan as a moderate, organic continuation of the ancient civilisations that flourished along the Indus River for over 5,000 years. Works of scholars such as K.K. Aziz, Sibte Hassan, Ayesha Jalal, Mubarak Ali, Muhammad Waseem, Aitzaz Ahsan and, later, Abdul Hameed Nayyar, Rubina Saigol, Pervez Hoodbhoy, M. Qasim Zaman, Manan Ahmed Asif and Ali Usman Qasmi, are instrumental in providing the intellectual material for this quiet shift. For decades, Pakistani historians who challenged the stateโ€™s narrative faced censorship, exile, isolation and financial ruin. Yet, the perspectives they championed are now quietly shaping the countryโ€™s evolving identity By the mid-2000s, counter-narratives became easier to evolve, but doing so in the 1980s and 1990s was a rather dangerous pursuit. In this column, I will explore this, alongside a now largely forgotten historian who pioneered the pursuit of challenging state-curated history, long before the stateโ€™s reactionary turn was fully formalised after 1971 and was cemented in the 1980s. In 1977, the source material Aziz was using to write a book on the โ€˜sensitiveโ€™ Hamoodur Rehman Report, was confiscated and allegedly destroyed by the Ziaul Haq dictatorship. The report was the outcome of a commission set up by the Z.A. Bhutto regime to investigate the civil war in East Pakistan. After Bhuttoโ€™s fall in July 1977 in a Zia-led coup, Aziz was forced to leave the country. In exile, he managed to find a research position at Heidelberg University in Germany. In 1985, during the peak of the Zia dictatorship, Aziz chose to return to Pakistan, where his brother-in-law provided him with a place to live in Lahore. Here he wrote his most influential book, The Murder of History. Though published by Najam Sethiโ€™s Vanguard Books, The Murder of History faced severe distribution hurdles from a regime hellbent on making it disappear. The book had used original source material to expose the glaring historical discrepancies that had crept into Pakistani textbooks after 1978. According to the late author and journalist Khaled Ahmed, when Aziz ran out of funds, he approached several wealthy patrons that he believed valued intellectual pursuits. But none replied. Relief came in 1994 when Benazir Bhuttoโ€™s second government sent Aziz to London, employing him at the Pakistan High Commission, so he could continue his multiple research projects. This stability ended in 1996, when the Benazir government was dismissed by President Farooq Leghari. Fortunately, the alumni of Lahoreโ€™s Government College (Ravians) stepped in to fund his research and stay in London, though this support from the Ravians eventually dried up in 1998. Upon returning to Pakistan that same year, Aziz was told he could no longer stay at his old Model Town residence. His once-doting brother-in-law had finally had enough of him. Aziz tried to earn a living as a lecturer, but discovered that no college or university would dare hire him. The Murder of History had ruffled too many feathers in the state, even though Aitzaz Ahsanโ€™s counter-narrative, The Indus Saga, was by then gracing the shelves of all major bookstores. Vanguard had already issued a second edition of The Murder of History in 1993 and, riding the wave of the popularity of counter-narrative literature generated by Aitzazโ€™s book, the publisher released a third edition in 1998. Driven by the increasing public interest in counter-narratives, The Murder of History finally began to sell well, more than a decade after it was first published. Although Aziz left Pakistan once more in 1999, The Murder of History had already established itself as an early work that systematically debunked the post-1971 narrative. It became an inspiration for a new generation of historians who have since driven a gradual shift in the stateโ€™s own historical outlook. Aziz passed away in 2009, having authored over 50 books. The Murder of History has gone through 12 editions and sold thousands of copies, vindicating a tome that long threatened the livelihood and life of its author for challenging a national narrative he refused to accept. Illustration by Abro Long before Aziz, though, there was Dr Ashiq Husain Batalvi. As a young scholar, Batalvi had worked closely with the poet-philosopher Muhammad Iqbal, and the founder of Pakistan, Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Following the creation of Pakistan in 1947, and particularly after Jinnahโ€™s demise in 1948, Batalvi had a falling out with the countryโ€™s nascent ruling elite. To Batalvi, this new leadership was abandoning the path Jinnah had envisioned. He watched with dismay as the state apparatus was infiltrated by men who had actively worked against Jinnah. These included landed elites from the anti-Jinnah Unionist Party and Islamists with whom Batalvi held deep ideological differences. Sidelined by these factions, Batalvi left the country in 1954. Settling in Britain, he became Dawnโ€™s foreign correspondent and earned his PhD from the prestigious School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS). His first post-Partition book was published in 1961, but it was in his landmark 1969 work Chand Yaadein Chand Tassuraat [Some Memories, Some Impressions] that he lamented in detail how post-Partition Pakistan had drifted away from its original inclusive and pluralistic ideals. Though a passionate Pakistani nationalist, Batalvi never returned to the country. To him, Jinnahโ€™s Pakistan was long dead. He continued writing for Dawn, but his output as a historian in his lifetime was eventually overshadowed by more prolific counter-narrative historians such as Aziz, Ali and Jalal. As mentioned, while early counter-narrative historians faced immense struggles in the 1980s and much of the 1990s, things in this regard have improved significantly since then, unlike the tightening of intellectual spaces in present-day India. Yet, certain institutional no-go areas remain. For instance, no local publisher or bookseller dares to touch Qasmiโ€™s 2014 study, The Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan. It remains one of the most thorough investigations into how the Ahmadiyya community was ousted from the fold of Islam in Pakistan. This is a stark reminder that, while the stateโ€™s narrative has softened on some fronts, certain historical truths are still deemed too dangerous to print. Published in Dawn, EOS, 31st, 2026

1 / 1 (์ด 8๊ฑด)